A) The lessee must continue paying rent until the premises are either rebuilt or the lease expires; but the landlord has a duty to act with reasonable speed in rebuilding the premises.
B) The tenant is released from paying rent and the lease is terminated; and unless the landlord could have prevented the disaster, the landlord generally has no duty to restore or repair.
C) The lessee must continue paying rent, and rebuilding the premises is the responsibility of the tenant if the tenant wishes to do so.
D) The lessee is excused from further rent payments until the premises are rebuilt, and the landlord has a duty to act with reasonable speed in rebuilding the premises.
E) The lessee must continue paying half the rent until the premises are either rebuilt or the lease expires; but the landlord has a duty to act with reasonable speed in rebuilding the premises.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) lobbies
B) elevators
C) stairs
D) hallways
E) a tenant's internal doorway
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) An assignment
B) A sublease
C) A lease transfer
D) A sublet
E) A rental swap agreement
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) She may withhold all the rent until the defect is fixed.
B) She may withhold all the rent in an escrow account until the defect is fixed.
C) She cannot withhold all the rent; she can withhold only the amount associated with the electricity.
D) A tenant may never withhold rent, however, she may create an escrow account for the fair market value of the rent.
E) No, a tenant's most important duty is to pay rent.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Surrender
B) Negotiated settlement
C) Forfeiture
D) An accord
E) Abandonment
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Hiram is responsible because he was negligent in keeping the premises in good condition.
B) The landlord is responsible because he was negligent in keeping the premises in good condition.
C) The landlord is responsible if the injury occurred in the common areas.
D) Hiram and the landlord are equally responsible.
E) Hiram is 60% responsible and the landlord is 40% responsible.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) No, Frederick is incorrect because Petra may stay in the apartment if the illegality is cured.
B) Yes, because rent is an integral part of the landlord-tenant relationship.
C) Yes, Petra should be evicted for failure to pay rent.
D) No, rent can be paid in various forms, such as money or services to the landlord.
E) Yes, rent consists of a monetary form of payment.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, if a city health and safety law requires the installation of sprinklers, the landlord is required to pay for it.
B) Yes, if the tenant requests the installation of sprinklers or other safety mechanisms, the landlord is required to pay for it.
C) Yes, the landlord is required to pay the cost of safety features that do not exceed the cost of one month's rent.
D) No, landlords are not required to pay the cost of safety features, but the tenant must receive permission for installation.
E) No, in general, it is the responsibility of the tenant, not the landlord to install safety features onto the property.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The landlord and new tenant are jointly responsible for removing the previous tenant.
B) The landlord is always required to remove the previous tenant.
C) In the majority of the states, the landlord is required to remove the previous tenant.
D) In the majority of the states, the landlord is required to simply provide legal possession of the premises, and thus the new tenant is responsible for removing the previous tenant.
E) The new tenant is responsible for removing the previous tenant.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) There is no lease created.
B) This is a period-tenancy
C) This is a tenancy-at-will
D) This is a tenancy-at-sufferance
E) This is an indefinite-term
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the defendant had no liability to the plaintiffs because of the concept of caveat emptor.
B) That the defendant had immunity under the Communications Decency Act.
C) That the defendant could not be held liable because neither the Fair Housing Act nor the California statutes applied to tenants looking for roommates.
D) That the defendant was enabling discrimination and was not entitled to immunity under the Communications Decency Act.
E) That the defendant was liable because it required discrimination in order to use its services.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, the implied warranty of habitability does not require the landlord to be responsible for repairs to major defects in the rental property.
B) Yes, the implied warranty of habitability generally does not require the landlord to bear the cost of defects in the rental property.
C) No, but Rodney is only responsible for repairs up to the cost of 10% of the month's rent.
D) No, the implied warranty of habitability generally ensures that the landlord is responsible for all repairs in the rental property.
E) No, the implied warranty of habitability generally ensures that the landlord is responsible for repairs to major defects in the rental property.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court ruled in favor of the landlord on the basis that the Fair Housing Act did not have sections requiring accommodation.
B) The court ruled in favor of the landlord on the basis that while accommodations may be required at times under the Fair Housing Act, assisting with cleaning is not one of them.
C) The court ruled in favor of the tenant on the basis that the tenant had established a reasonable basis supporting the need of reasonable accommodation in regard to cleaning.
D) The court ruled in favor of the tenant on the basis that the tenant suffered additional stress due to harassment regarding rent and that, therefore, the landlord was responsible for providing assistance with cleaning.
E) The appellate court remanded the case to the lower court to apply a test which focused on the landlord-tenant relationship, not on the impact one tenant has on other tenants, in order to determine whether the tenant was entitled to a reasonable accommodation.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Promise of tranquility
B) Agreement of quiet
C) Covenant of quiet enjoyment
D) Contract of enjoyment
E) Contract of tranquility
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Before the year 2000, evictions were extremely uncommon in Japan because of laws intended to protect tenants. These laws provided automatic renewals of leases for tenants.
B) In 2000, with the passing of the Law on the Promotion of Supply of Good Quality Housing, automatic renewals of lease agreements became less common.
C) Most homes are still rented using what is called futsu shakuya keiyaku, which is a type of lease that does not have a fixed termination date.
D) Because most homes are rented without a fixed termination date, it is less common for landlords in Japan to engage in eviction.
E) When there is a conflict between a landlord and tenant, the landlord is likely to sue the tenant and take the tenant to court because Japanese courts tend to find in favor of landlords rather than tenants.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A year or longer
B) Less than a year
C) Two years or less
D) It depends on the state
E) They are for an indefinite time period
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 21 - 40 of 90
Related Exams