Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

Almost any individual or group of people can serve as a partner.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following property rights do partners have, when the articles of partnership are silent?


A) The right to participate in the management of the business, the right to possess partnership property, and the right to an interest in the partnership.
B) The right to participate in the management of the business, but not the right to possess partnership property or the right to an interest in the partnership.
C) The right to participate in the management of the business and the right to possess partnership property, but not the right to an interest in the partnership.
D) The right to participate in the management of the business and the right to an interest in the partnership, but not the right to possess partnership property.
E) The right to possess partnership property and the right to an interest in the partnership; but not the right to participate in the management of the business because while the right to participate in management may exist, it is not a property right.

F) B) and E)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The fiduciary duty includes the duty to be loyal.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

[Mortuary Blues] Jack and Bianca had a partnership running a mortuary. Bianca died, and after her death, Jack decided to shut down the mortuary. Jack incurred some expenses in closing the business affairs of the mortuary. He sought compensation for those expenses but Gus, the executor of Bianca's estate, objected. Gus also claimed that Jack had no rights in Bianca's share of the partnership property and that Gus, the executor, had the right to confiscate her share of the property and sell it at auction. Jack, however, took the position that all interests of Bianca passed to Jack and that Jack owed her estate nothing. The articles of partnership did not address death. -Which of the following examples of sharing of profits could constitute evidence of the existence of a partnership?


A) Pablo, a photographer who sets up photoshoots, gives his friend Olita, who is learning the business, $100 for "helping him out" on the photoshoots.
B) Pablo, a photographer, gives his friend Olita, who owns a building, $500 for letting him use an apartment for his photoshoots.
C) Pablo, a photographer, gives Olita $500 from the fees of a photoshoot, to repay a loan.
D) After Pablo's photography partner dies, Pablo gives Olita, the partner's widow, $100 a month out of respect for Sander.
E) Pablo and Olita, two photographers, split the fees obtained at their photoshoots.

F) A) and B)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following statements is false regarding the treatment of a partnership as a legal entity?


A) A partnership is often considered a legal entity when it is sued or being sued.
B) State law determines whether a partnership can or cannot be named in litigation.
C) Title to property can be put in the partnership name.
D) Every partner is considered an agent of the partnership, but not every partner has a fiduciary duty to all other partners.
E) Under the doctrine of marshaling assets, partnership assets are arranged in a certain order to pay any outstanding debts.

F) A) and B)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

[Car Repair] Gordon and Leo are partners in SafeT Car, a full service automotive repair company. Leo does nearly all of the day-to-day work as Gordon is thinking about retiring. When Leo was moving a customer's car last week, he accidentally collided with the garage door, and the door had to be replaced at a cost of $6,000. Leo recently met with BigBox stores about a potential deal by which BigBox would set up a SafeT Car shop in every BigBox store nationwide. Leo signed an agreement to open a "test" store in one BigBox store. Leo hasn't told Gordon yet, because Gordon hasn't been in the office in a month. Gordon opens The Oil Place, an express oil change company, which he plans to have his sons operate in his retirement. When Leo learns about The Oil Place, he threatens to sue Gordon for breach of duty because Leo is sick of doing all the work at SafeT Car while Gordon was apparently opening a competing business. Gordon tells Leo that he hasn't breached any duty and they don't have a written agreement that restricts Gordon from opening his own store with his sons. Gordon also tells Leo that the $6,000 for the damaged door is coming out of Leo's pocket. Leo, who's thinking about the potential deal about BigBox, tells Gordon he wants to split up the partnership. -Kayla and Yoshi form a partnership to sell rocks for landscaping purposes. They are having trouble getting customers as well as loans for inventory. Kayla falsely tells ABC bank and customers that her parents are partners in the business. Her parents find out but take no steps to provide correct information. Kayla and Yoshi default on a loan to ABC Bank, and the bank sues Kayla's parents. Will the bank likely prevail, and why or why not?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The bank will likely prevail on a theory...

View Answer

Which of the following statements is true under the Uniform Partnership Act, regarding profit and partnerships?


A) There is no requirement that a partnership be formed with a profit-making motive, and all states recognize the status of non-profit partnerships.
B) A partnership must have a profit-making motive only if the partnership has five or more members.
C) There is a requirement that a partnership have a profit-making motive only if the partnership has been in existence for over one year.
D) The partners must operate the business for a profit, and the partnership must be dissolved if no profit is made for three consecutive years.
E) The partners must operate the business for a profit, which is construed to mean that the partners must intend to make some kind of profit from the business.

F) C) and D)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

[Car Repair] Gordon and Leo are partners in SafeT Car, a full service automotive repair company. Leo does nearly all of the day-to-day work as Gordon is thinking about retiring. When Leo was moving a customer's car last week, he accidentally collided with the garage door, and the door had to be replaced at a cost of $6,000. Leo recently met with BigBox stores about a potential deal by which BigBox would set up a SafeT Car shop in every BigBox store nationwide. Leo signed an agreement to open a "test" store in one BigBox store. Leo hasn't told Gordon yet, because Gordon hasn't been in the office in a month. Gordon opens The Oil Place, an express oil change company, which he plans to have his sons operate in his retirement. When Leo learns about The Oil Place, he threatens to sue Gordon for breach of duty because Leo is sick of doing all the work at SafeT Car while Gordon was apparently opening a competing business. Gordon tells Leo that he hasn't breached any duty and they don't have a written agreement that restricts Gordon from opening his own store with his sons. Gordon also tells Leo that the $6,000 for the damaged door is coming out of Leo's pocket. Leo, who's thinking about the potential deal about BigBox, tells Gordon he wants to split up the partnership. -Lauren is a partner in a law firm. Pursuant to the partnership agreement, however, she does not have authority to make purchases for the firm. Lauren goes to Downtown Office Supply and buys a computer on the firm's account. She later quits the law firm and takes the computer with her. Assuming that Downtown Office Supply knew she was a partner but did not know that she lacked authority, what remedies are available to Downtown Office Supply, and why?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Downtown Office Supply could sue and rec...

View Answer

Which of the following is true about the Revised Uniform Partnership Act (RUPA) ?


A) There is no disagreement between the Uniform Partnership Act and the Revised Uniform Partnership Act about the rules of partnership.
B) Changes in relation to the Revised Uniform Partnership Act and the Uniform Partnership Act are insignificant.
C) Roughly half of the states have adopted the RUPA
D) The RUPA just took effect in 2010.
E) The Revised Uniform Partnership Act did not expand the UPA

F) B) and D)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A creditor can obtain a(n) ________, which entitles the creditor to the partner's profits while the partner continues to act as a partner and engage in the partnership business.


A) garnishment order
B) payment order
C) creditor's lien
D) accounting order
E) charging order

F) None of the above
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The duty of obedience is considered ________


A) a fiduciary duty.
B) an article of good faith in a partnership agreement.
C) the duty that binds the partnership to federal law.
D) a duty associated with the distribution of profits.
E) a duty for any personal expenditures to be itemized out for the partnership.

F) C) and D)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

[Partnership Problems] Jamar, Kenya, and Tamika want to form a partnership to sell students resume preparation and employment search services. Jamar asks Kenya and Tamika if they should draw up some sort of agreement. Kenya replies that a written agreement is not legally required and that an oral agreement will set up a partnership. Upon the urging of Jamar and Tamika, however, Kenya agreed to a written document setting up the partnership, which they all signed. It was a simple agreement listing the partners and did not specifically address the right to management or allocation of profits and losses. Kenya has an opportunity to assist some students with resumes and does so without revealing her employment to the partnership; she keeps the payment she receives for herself. When Jamar and Tamika find out, Kenya replies that she was doing two-thirds of the partnership work, particularly in regard to management; that she, therefore, has two-thirds of the voting rights; and that she voted that her actions were appropriate. The articles of partnership does not address the right to share in management, but Jamar and Tamika strongly disagree with Kenya. -Is Kenya's statement that a written agreement is not necessary to set up a partnership correct?


A) Yes, she is correct.
B) Yes, she is correct, but only because three or fewer members are involved.
C) No, she is incorrect, but only because fewer than five members are involved.
D) Yes, she is correct only if all partners are considered sophisticated investors.
E) No, she is incorrect only if none of the partners have experience with the partnership form of business.

F) A) and B)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Unless otherwise agreed in the articles of partnership, which of the following is true regarding rights partners have in regard to their interactions with other partners?


A) Partners have the right to participate equally in management, the right to share equally in profits, the obligation to share equally in losses, and the right to additional compensation for devoting time to the business.
B) The right to participate in management according to the level of capital contribution, the right to share in profits according to the level of capital contribution, the obligation to share in losses according to the level of capital contribution, and the right to additional compensation for devoting time to the business.
C) The right to participate in management according to the level of capital contribution, the right to share equally in profits, the obligation to share equally in losses, and the right to additional compensation for devoting time to the business.
D) The right to participate equally in management, the right to share in profits according to the level of capital contribution, the obligation to share in losses according to the level of capital contribution, but no right to additional compensation for devoting time to the business.
E) The right to participate equally in management, the right to share equally in profits, the right to share equally in losses, but no right to additional compensation for devoting time to the business.

F) B) and E)
G) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

[Health Food] Josh and Merida are partners and owners of J&M Health Food Store. Carson, who is a registered dietician, works for J&M on and off as a consultant, as he is very knowledgeable about the health benefits of natural herbs. Carson travels to conventions around the country and tests new products and often relays information about the new products to J&M. At a convention last month, Carson met Monte, a vitamin producer, who stated that he was glad to meet one of J&M's partners. Carson replied that the new Fresh product line was exactly what J&M needed and placed a significant order for J&M. When the Fresh product was delivered, J&M had closed the store for remodeling, and the product spoiled. -Can Monte seek damages from Carson?


A) No, because the agreement was with J&M.
B) Yes, because Carson represented himself as a partner of J&M and Monte reasonably relied on this information to his detriment.
C) No, because Monte should have verified the delivery.
D) Yes, because Carson is a partner of J&M, and Carson can seek indemnification from J&M.
E) No, because there was no partnership by estoppel.

F) A) and E)
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is false regarding the rights and obligations of partners?


A) Each partner can serve as an agent for the partnership.
B) As long as the partner has authority to act, each partner's act in performing business duties is binding on the partnership.
C) As long as the partner has authority to act, each partner's act in making agreements with third parties is binding on the partnership.
D) As long as one partner has authority to act and the partnership is bound by the act, each partner has unlimited personal liability for the obligation.
E) A partner cannot serve as an agent for other partners.

F) All of the above
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

[Grooming Grievances] Andrew, Marie, and Cruz formed a partnership to groom dogs. Because they were good friends and anticipated making a profit sufficient to compensate all partners well, the articles of partnership did not allocate profit or losses. Marie was appointed managing partner. Unfortunately, the business did not go as well as expected and the partnership incurred some losses. Cruz claimed that he should not have to share in losses because he had groomed more dogs than anyone. Cruz also claimed that although the partnership did not reference compensation for additional duties, he was entitled to compensation because of his extensive work. Marie claimed that she should not have to share in losses because she contributed more capital than did either of the others. Andrew claimed that he should not have to cover the losses because both Marie and Cruz had been hiding the books from him. He demanded to inspect the books and also to review a listing of all partnership assets and profit statements listing distributions to partners. Marie and Cruz denied that they had been hiding the books and claimed complete innocence of any wrongdoing. -Is Andrew entitled to a review of all partnership assets and profit statements listing the distributions to partners?


A) Yes, because partners are always entitled to an accounting.
B) No, because there is no evidence that one of the other partners failed to disclose a profit or benefit earned from the partnership.
C) Yes, if he can establish that a review would be just and reasonable.
D) No, because he had not been appointed the managing partner.
E) No, because there is no evidence that one of the partners committed fraud against the partnership.

F) A) and B)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

[Car Repair] Gordon and Leo are partners in SafeT Car, a full service automotive repair company. Leo does nearly all of the day-to-day work as Gordon is thinking about retiring. When Leo was moving a customer's car last week, he accidentally collided with the garage door, and the door had to be replaced at a cost of $6,000. Leo recently met with BigBox stores about a potential deal by which BigBox would set up a SafeT Car shop in every BigBox store nationwide. Leo signed an agreement to open a "test" store in one BigBox store. Leo hasn't told Gordon yet, because Gordon hasn't been in the office in a month. Gordon opens The Oil Place, an express oil change company, which he plans to have his sons operate in his retirement. When Leo learns about The Oil Place, he threatens to sue Gordon for breach of duty because Leo is sick of doing all the work at SafeT Car while Gordon was apparently opening a competing business. Gordon tells Leo that he hasn't breached any duty and they don't have a written agreement that restricts Gordon from opening his own store with his sons. Gordon also tells Leo that the $6,000 for the damaged door is coming out of Leo's pocket. Leo, who's thinking about the potential deal about BigBox, tells Gordon he wants to split up the partnership. -Cameron a partner in a pool and sauna business, enters into a written agreement with a supplier for chemicals for their pool business without the other partners' signatures on the agreement. Does Cameron have the authority to do so?


A) Yes, implied authority permits partners to enter into agreements necessary to carry on partnership business.
B) Yes, actual authority permits partners to enter into agreements regardless of the subject matter.
C) No, all partners to the pool and spa business must be signatories to a written agreement.
D) Yes, implied authority permits partners to enter into agreements regardless of the subject matter and for any amount of money.
E) No, unless the partnership agreement specifically authorizes only Cameron to order pool supplies.

F) A) and D)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In a partnership, the partners own partnership property as tenants in property, which means they own it ________


A) individually.
B) as tenants in common.
C) in equal shares.
D) as a group.
E) as tenants with the right of the partnership to take their interest away.

F) C) and D)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

[Car Repair] Gordon and Leo are partners in SafeT Car, a full service automotive repair company. Leo does nearly all of the day-to-day work as Gordon is thinking about retiring. When Leo was moving a customer's car last week, he accidentally collided with the garage door, and the door had to be replaced at a cost of $6,000. Leo recently met with BigBox stores about a potential deal by which BigBox would set up a SafeT Car shop in every BigBox store nationwide. Leo signed an agreement to open a "test" store in one BigBox store. Leo hasn't told Gordon yet, because Gordon hasn't been in the office in a month. Gordon opens The Oil Place, an express oil change company, which he plans to have his sons operate in his retirement. When Leo learns about The Oil Place, he threatens to sue Gordon for breach of duty because Leo is sick of doing all the work at SafeT Car while Gordon was apparently opening a competing business. Gordon tells Leo that he hasn't breached any duty and they don't have a written agreement that restricts Gordon from opening his own store with his sons. Gordon also tells Leo that the $6,000 for the damaged door is coming out of Leo's pocket. Leo, who's thinking about the potential deal about BigBox, tells Gordon he wants to split up the partnership. -Is Leo liable to the partnership for the $6,000 repair?


A) Yes, unless he disclosed the fact of the collision to Gordon within a reasonable time.
B) Yes, because Leo breached his duty of care in not being careful when moving the car.
C) No, because the garage door is property of the partnership.
D) No, as long as the collision was an honest mistake.
E) No, because the collision occurred on partnership property.

F) B) and E)
G) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

[Car Repair] Gordon and Leo are partners in SafeT Car, a full service automotive repair company. Leo does nearly all of the day-to-day work as Gordon is thinking about retiring. When Leo was moving a customer's car last week, he accidentally collided with the garage door, and the door had to be replaced at a cost of $6,000. Leo recently met with BigBox stores about a potential deal by which BigBox would set up a SafeT Car shop in every BigBox store nationwide. Leo signed an agreement to open a "test" store in one BigBox store. Leo hasn't told Gordon yet, because Gordon hasn't been in the office in a month. Gordon opens The Oil Place, an express oil change company, which he plans to have his sons operate in his retirement. When Leo learns about The Oil Place, he threatens to sue Gordon for breach of duty because Leo is sick of doing all the work at SafeT Car while Gordon was apparently opening a competing business. Gordon tells Leo that he hasn't breached any duty and they don't have a written agreement that restricts Gordon from opening his own store with his sons. Gordon also tells Leo that the $6,000 for the damaged door is coming out of Leo's pocket. Leo, who's thinking about the potential deal about BigBox, tells Gordon he wants to split up the partnership. -Simon, a partner in Big City Law Firm, uses the firm's credit card to purchase tickets for front row seats at the World Series for himself and his son. Whose property are the tickets?


A) Simon's property, as long as the price was de minimus.
B) Big City Law Firm, unless Simon reasonably believed that property purchased with that partnership credit card would become his personal property.
C) Simon's property, because a partnership is not a person.
D) Big City Law Firm.
E) It would depend on the terms of the credit card agreement.

F) None of the above
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 61 - 80 of 90

Related Exams

Show Answer