A) Wendy would prevail because she did not authorize Rob to extend an offer.
B) Wendy would prevail because Rob exceeded his authority in the transaction.
C) Wendy would prevail because Rob should sue the seller, not Wendy.
D) Rob would prevail because Wendy owed him money for services rendered.
E) Rob would prevail because he negotiated a vacation home for Wendy that met most of her requirements.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Respondeat Superior
B) Superior Respondeat
C) Stare decisis
D) Res judicata
E) In Pari Delicto
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) a representative capacity.
B) the presence of a notary.
C) the presence of the disclosed or undisclosed principal.
D) a bank or an institution that would accept the negotiable instrument.
E) connection with an auxiliary promise to the contract.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Jason is liable to Sakura for the cost of the book.
B) Jason is liable to Sakura for the cost of the book only if Sakura had Jason sign a document affirming his liability before Sakura paid Gwen.
C) Jason is liable to Sakura only if she resells the book and is unable to recover as much as she paid for it.
D) Jason is not liable to Sakura for the cost of the book.
E) Jason can avoid liability to Sakura only if he can establish that his actions constituted "justifiable expectations" under the law absolving him from liability.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That a defendant in the position of the hospital is vicariously liable for injuries received within its premises without a need for further proof.
B) That because the plaintiff dismissed the hospital's alleged agent from the lawsuit, she could not proceed even though she had sued the hospital before dismissing the agent.
C) That the plaintiff was barred from proceeding because vicarious liability is not recognized in the medical malpractice arena.
D) That the plaintiff could proceed but only because she had already established liability on the part of the physician employees involved.
E) That the hospital could be held vicariously liable if the plaintiff established that a wrongful act harming her occurred within the scope of the agent's employment.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Gladian was on a substantial departure
B) Gladian is on minimal departure
C) Gladian is on a half departure
D) Gladian is on an absolute departure
E) Gladian is on an unauthorized departure
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) The third party is totally unaware that the agent is action for a principal.
B) A third party can sue both the principal and the agent for misrepresentation.
C) A third party is aware that an agent is making an agreement on behalf of a principal, and the third party also knows the identity of the principal.
D) A third party can choose to contract only with the agent instead of the principal.
E) A third party must consult with the principal before agreeing to be bound in any contract.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Death
B) Bankruptcy
C) Impossibility
D) Lapse of time
E) War
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Insolvency of the principal
B) Occurrence of a specific event
C) Revocation of authority
D) Fulfillment of purpose
E) Renunciation by the agent
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) If the third party is aware of the principal's existence but not his or her identity, the principal is classified as a disclosed principal.
B) When the third party is aware that the agent is making an agreement on behalf of a principal and also knows who the principal is, the principal is a disclosed principal.
C) An unidentified principal is in the same classification as a partially disclosed principal.
D) If the third party does not know that an agent is acting on behalf of a principal, an undisclosed principal is involved.
E) Classification of the principal is important because it helps determine the principal's liability.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Jun will likely be held liable for Tomás's injuries because while Connor was acting outside the scope of his duties at the time of the accident, he had not substantially departed from the course of his employer's business.
B) Jun will likely be held liable for Tomás's injuries because Connor was driving Jun's truck at the time of the accident.
C) Jun will likely be held liable for Tomás's injuries because Jun allowed Connor to take the truck home regardless of Jun's instructions regarding the use of the truck.
D) It is unlikely that Jun will be held liable for Tomás's injuries because Connor had substantially departed from the course of his employer's business.
E) It is unlikely that Jun will be held liable for Tomás's injuries unless it can be proven that Connor had no insurance and lacks the ability to pay.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Whether the employer authorized the employee's act.
B) Whether the employer provided the tools by which the act occurred.
C) Whether the employer knew that the act would involve the commission of a serious crime.
D) Whether the employee had worked for the employer for a substantial amount of time.
E) Whether the employee used force not expected by the employer.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) It ends immediately
B) 24 hours
C) 48 hours
D) 7 days
E) 10 days
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That Uber drivers are independent contractors who do not hold the same status as an employee for purposes of vicarious liability.
B) That the assault occurred outside the scope of employment so that Uber was allowed to dismiss the case.
C) That although the assault did not occur within the scope of the driver's employment, Uber was vicariously liable for the act because the assault was criminal nature.
D) That even though the Uber drivers are considered independent contractors, Uber can still be vicariously liable because Uber knew of the criminal act but did nothing.
E) For the purpose of surviving a motion to dismiss, plaintiffs had plausibly alleged that the Uber drivers were acting within the scope of employment when they assaulted plaintiffs.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) agency for an agent
B) agency coupled with an interest
C) agency benefitting the agent
D) agency compensation principle
E) agency entitlement principle
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) In Singapore because of the fear of fraud, agents are not allowed to engage in electronic transactions on behalf of principals.
B) Singapore relies on a type of law similar to U.S. common law in addressing agency authority in regard to electronic transactions.
C) Singapore passed a law providing that a principal must countersign any electronic transaction engaged in by an agent.
D) Singapore passed a law providing that each employer must post a list electronically of all its agents with authority to act on its behalf.
E) Singapore passed a law by which lack of awareness of a principal for an agent's acts is not recognized as a defense.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 80 of 90
Related Exams