A) Personal defenses, real
B) Real defenses; personal
C) Holder's rights; real
D) Personal rights; personal defenses
E) Personal defenses; holder's rights
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Presentment
B) Payment or tender of payment
C) Cancelation or renunciation by the holder
D) Reacquisition
E) Impairment of collateral
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) purposeful defenses
B) party defenses
C) universal defenses
D) proprietary defenses
E) personal defenses
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, agents are personally liable when they sign their own name and omit the name of the principal.
B) Yes, Charla may be personally liable because Jirah is a holder in due course and was not aware Charla signed on behalf of Prida's.
C) No, Jirah is not a holder in due course and Charla will not be held liable if she can show that it was not Prida's intent to hold Charla personally liable.
D) No, agents can never be personally liable even if the principal's name does not appear on the note.
E) No because Jirah was a holder in due course.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) primarily liable
B) secondarily liable
C) partially liable
D) not liable
E) endorsee liable
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) 30
B) 60
C) 90
D) 120
E) 180
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) clause
B) warranty
C) time limit
D) primary liability
E) secondary liability
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The only commercially reasonable manner for notice of dishonor recognized by the UCC is certified mail.
B) The UCC recognizes two manners of delivery for notice of dishonor that are considered commercially reasonable: written and electronic.
C) The only commercially reasonable manner recognized by the UCC for notice of dishonor is written mail.
D) Due to advances in technology, the only commercially reasonable manner recognized by the UCC for notice of dishonor is electronic communication.
E) The UCC recognizes that oral, written, and electronic communications are all commercially reasonable ways in which to provide notice of dishonor.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Because both the plaintiff and the bank were found negligent, the plaintiff was denied recovery.
B) Because only the bank was found negligent, the plaintiff was denied recovery.
C) Because both the plaintiff and the bank were found negligent, the plaintiff recovered only 50% of his losses.
D) Because only the bank was found negligent, the plaintiff was entitled to recover the value of the checks.
E) Based on public policy, the plaintiff was denied recovery although no negligence was found on the part of either party.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No, a signature is required to hold a party liable for a negotiable instrument.
B) Yes, because the "X" Branson wrote on the instrument could constitute a signature if Branson used it with the intent to authenticate the instrument.
C) No, because the "X" does not constitute a signature because it does not identify the endorser.
D) Yes, the "X" could constitute a signature, but only if Branson also printed his name on the note.
E) No, public policy would not support holding a party liable for payment if that party did not actually sign the instrument.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Maker
B) Acceptor
C) Drawer
D) Endorser
E) Promisor
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) transfer liability
B) primarily liable
C) maker liability
D) recognized liable
E) secondarily liable
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Felicia is primarily liable, and Arut, Gibson, and Branson are secondarily liable.
B) Felicia, Arut, Gibson, and Branson are equally liable.
C) Only Felicia, because the liability of past holders was renunciated.
D) Only Felicia, because when Felicia reacquired the note, she cancelled Arut's, Gibson's, and Branson's endorsements.
E) Felicia is primarily liable, and Arut and Gibson are secondarily liable. Branson is not liable since he did not sign the note.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Anne is correct.
B) Anne is correct only if Rahul is able to pay and has not filed bankruptcy.
C) Anne is correct in stating that Floyd should seek recovery from Rahul only if Hema has filed bankruptcy because, otherwise, Floyd should be pursuing litigation against Hema.
D) Anne is correct unless the note is for over $10,000, in which case Floyd can seek recovery from her without resorting to recovery from Rahul or Hema.
E) Anne is incorrect. Floyd may seek recovery from her without first seeking recovery from Rahul.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the defending employer had to pay no dues at all because a representative of the plaintiff wrongfully misrepresented the contents of the written document.
B) That the defending employer had to pay only the dues of the employees who were working out-of-town within the area of the union involved because a representative of the plaintiff wrongfully misrepresented the contents of the written document.
C) That although a representative of the plaintiff misinformed the defending employer of the contents of the written document, the defendant's representative had sufficient opportunity to read the document; and the defending employer was therefore liable for dues of all its employees.
D) That the defending employer was liable for all the dues regardless of whether a representative of the plaintiff misinformed the defending employer of the contents of the written document and regardless of whether the defendant's representative had an opportunity to read it.
E) That while the defending employer would be liable for all dues under common law, because of applicable federal labor law, the defending employer was liable for dues only for employees working out-of-town within the area of the union involved.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 80 of 90
Related Exams