Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) He is not a holder in due course because he did not provide value.
B) He is not a holder because he did not provide value.
C) He is not a holder nor is he a holder in due course because he did not provide value.
D) The fact that a gift was involved does not prevent Nate from being a holder in due course so long as other requirements are satisfied.
E) The fact that a gift was involved does not prevent Nate from being a holder in due course so long as other requirements are satisfied and Nate is not a minor.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) holder
B) holder in due course
C) bearer
D) endorser
E) possessor
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) criminal
B) civil
C) personal
D) alteration
E) forgery
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) ABC Company will prevail because American Express, as a payee, does not qualify as a holder in due course.
B) ABC Company will prevail because American Express should have realized that fraud was involved from the fact that the checks were ABC Company checks.
C) ABC Company will prevail because fraud was involved.
D) American Express will prevail and will not be required to return funds.
E) American Express will have to return half of the funds because the parties were equally at fault, American Express for taking the checks, and ABC Company for not more carefully supervising its employee.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) An allonge
B) A transferor
C) A transferee
D) An endorser
E) An endorsee
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Commercial standards.
B) Subjective reasonableness.
C) Objective reasonableness.
D) Good faith.
E) Reasonable investigation.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) It has no effect on any subsequent holder.
B) It has no effect on anyone, including, but not limited to, any subsequent holder.
C) It means that Hiro Murakami does not provide any guarantees to subsequent holders if the instrument is later dishonored.
D) It means that Hiro Murakami is providing that any subsequent holder cannot be held liable.
E) It means that Hiro Murakami is providing that neither he nor the person who transferred the instrument to him can be held further liable to any subsequent holder.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) She is correct because both names are required in order to provide legal endorsement.
B) She is correct in that her name was needed for legal endorsement, but that is only the case because of the misspelling of Annie's name.
C) She is correct because regardless of whether the payees are listed with no designation as to whether they are alternate or joint, or whether the words, "or" or "and" are used to designated payees, any listed payee must endorse a note in order for it to be properly payable.
D) She is incorrect because Annie properly endorsed the note, and only her signature was needed.
E) She is incorrect, but only if it can be established that Hiro Murakami lacked knowledge that she had not given her consent to the form of the endorsement.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) order
B) bearer
C) transfer
D) payee
E) acknowledgement
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) order paper
B) allonge
C) bank note
D) a blank endorsement
E) qualified endorsements
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The managing partner only.
B) The financial officer only.
C) The bookkeeper only.
D) The treasurer only.
E) Any authorized representative.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The person taking the instrument cannot become a holder in due course.
B) The alteration does not prevent a person taking the flawed instrument from becoming a holder in due course.
C) There is no effect so long as the payee can establish that he or she did not receive any more consideration than that to which the payee was entitled.
D) The instrument is considered materially altered, but it only prevents transfer to a holder in due course if the holder in due course had knowledge that the payee had done the alteration.
E) The instrument is considered materially altered, but it only prevents transfer to a holder in due course if the transferee participated in the material alteration.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Blank, special, and allonge.
B) Special and allonge, but not blank.
C) Special and blank, but not allonge.
D) Blank and allonge, but not special.
E) There are no qualified endorsements.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Under the UCC a person has notice of a fact only when the person has actual knowledge of the fact.
B) Under the UCC a person has notice of a fact under the following two circumstances: (1) when the person has actual knowledge of the fact, and (2) when the person receives notice or notification of the fact.
C) Under the UCC a person has notice of a fact under the following three circumstances: (1) when the person has actual knowledge of the fact, (2) when the person receives notice or notification of the fact, and (3) when the person has reason to know the fact exists.
D) Under the UCC a person has notice of a fact only when the person has signed a verification to the effect that notice was received.
E) Under the UCC a person has notice of a fact only when the person receives written notification either through regular mail or electronic means.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Allonge
B) Transferor
C) Transferee
D) Endorser
E) Endorsee
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The plaintiff was allowed to recover under the shelter principle and holder-in-due-course status.
B) The plaintiff was not allowed to recover because he took the check knowing of a problem.
C) The plaintiff was allowed to recover because the market misrepresented the status of the check.
D) The plaintiff was not allowed to recover because of the shelter principle and holder-in-due-course status.
E) The plaintiff was not allowed to recover because the market misrepresented the status of the check.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 80 of 90
Related Exams