Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Any attempt to disclaim the implied warranty of merchantability is per se unconscionable, but a court will enforce the disclaimer if the buyer is another merchant and is fully informed of the disclaimer.
B) Any attempt to disclaim the implied warranty of merchantability is per se unconscionable, and a court will refuse to enforce the disclaimer.
C) Under some situations, a disclaimer of the implied warranty of merchantability may be made within 10 days after a sale.
D) A disclaimer of the implied warranty of merchantability may be done orally.
E) By federal law, there is no requirement that the term "merchantability" be used in any disclaimer.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, because unless Carmen had a written promise specifically providing for a warranty, the computer was sold without a warranty.
B) Yes, because unless Carmen had an oral promise specifically promising a warranty or a written contract specifically providing for a warranty, the computer was sold without a warranty.
C) No, because the computer was sold with a warranty of merchantability.
D) No, because the computer was sold with a warranty of merchantability and also with a warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
E) No, because the computer was sold with a warranty of merchantability, with a warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, and also with an express warranty.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) availability warranties.
B) for particular purposes.
C) implied warranties.
D) considered good title.
E) only allowed for goods over $10,000.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) an implied warranty
B) an express warranty
C) a claimed warranty
D) puffing
E) a consequential warranty
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, because the couch and loveseat are consumer goods.
B) Yes, because the couch and loveseat were valued over $500.
C) No, because Joseph is not a merchant buying goods in the ordinary course of business.
D) No, because the purchaser must have purchased or leased the goods from a merchant.
E) Not unless formal title to the couch and loveseat was transferred to Joseph.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No, because there was no writing guaranteeing the warranty signed by the salesperson.
B) No, because Kristin was only engaged in puffing.
C) No, because only the manager can make such a warranty.
D) Yes, but only because Kristin verbally made certain promises.
E) Yes, because there was a reasonable expectation of how the vehicle would perform.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Nicole made an express warranty by not speaking up regarding the blender's power.
B) Nicole made an express warranty by not speaking up regarding the blender's power only if Cara can prove that Nicole knew it was not a high-power blender.
C) Nicole made an express warranty by not speaking up regarding the blender's power only if Cara can prove that Nicole knew she wanted to make smoothies.
D) Nicole made an express warranty by not speaking up regarding the blender's power only if Nicole can prove that she, Nicole, was unaware that the blender was not a high-power blender.
E) Nicole did not make an express warranty.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A buyer may not waive warranties.
B) A buyer may waive implied warranties but not express warranties.
C) A buyer may waive express warranties but not implied warranties.
D) A buyer may waive both express warranties and implied warranties.
E) A buyer may waive express warranties and the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, but not the implied warranty of merchantability.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) the implied warranty of merchantability
B) the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose
C) the implied warranty of trade usage
D) an express warranty
E) an express warranty of quality
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) XYZ Company will win because although Lexi sued within the statute of limitations, in such situations Lexi must sue the manufacturer.
B) XYZ Company will win because although Lexi correctly sued the seller, Lexi filed suit outside the four year statute of limitations.
C) XYZ Company will win because in such situations Lexi must sue the manufacturer and also because Lexi filed suit outside the four year statute of limitations.
D) Lexi will be allowed to proceed because she can hold XYZ Company responsible and because the statute of limitations was tolled during negotiations, she sued on a timely basis.
E) Lexi will win because she can hold XYZ Company responsible and because there is no statute of limitations for business goods of this type.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Canada
B) Kazakhstan
C) Japan
D) China
E) Norway
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No, because the sample was just an example of puffing.
B) No, because the sample did not claim to make representations.
C) No, because express warranties must be written and not oral.
D) No, but the sample created an implied warranty.
E) Yes, a sample or model may provide an express warranty.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Puffing
B) Falsehoods
C) Innocent misrepresentations
D) Fraudulent misrepresentations
E) Negligent misrepresentations
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, seller warranties are found in the UCC.
B) No, seller warranties are found in the Restatement of Contracts.
C) No, seller warranties are found in the Magnuson-Moss Act.
D) No, seller warranties are found in the Consumer Warranty and Protection Act.
E) No, seller warranties are found in the Consumer Rights Protection Act of 1976.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) 10 days.
B) One month.
C) 18 months.
D) Three years.
E) Four years.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 1 - 20 of 89
Related Exams