A) Luke is correct. Maya was required to deliver the furniture, but she retained the right to sue him for any deficiency.
B) Luke is correct but only because of the special UCC exception for consumer goods.
C) Luke is incorrect. Maya had a right to withhold the furniture.
D) Luke is incorrect but only if Maya can prove that she had no reason to believe that he was a credit risk prior to signing the contract of sale.
E) Luke is correct because of federal consumer protection laws.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) She has no right to cover although she may sue for damages because, while the UCC allows for installment sales, deposits are not required in the installment sale situation.
B) She has a right to cover only because she is a consumer, not a merchant.
C) She has a right to cover only if she pays the initial watercraft seller any amount by which the cost of the watercraft used for cover was lower than the cost of the initial watercraft.
D) She has no right to cover only because she is a consumer, not a merchant.
E) She has no right to cover, and the merchant was not required to deliver the personal watercraft.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Nominal damages
B) Compensatory damages
C) Reliance damages
D) Liquidated damages
E) Consequential damages
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Reject the goods and obtain cover only
B) Obtain cover only
C) Reject the goods and cancel the contract only
D) Reject the goods, and then obtain cover or cancel the contract
E) Reject the goods and obtain cover, but the buyer may not cancel the contract
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Cover
B) Mutual breach
C) Rescission
D) Repudiation
E) Tort litigation
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Punitive damages
B) Nominal damages
C) Remedial damages
D) Consequential damages
E) Compensatory damages
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) parol evidence rule
B) common law
C) federal law
D) limitations of law
E) statute of limitations
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) When the modifications or limitations seem to give one side a benefit.
B) When one party to the agreement is a corporation.
C) When neither party to the agreement is a corporation.
D) When one party was not represented by an attorney.
E) When the remedies agreed upon fail in their essential purpose.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That is the only remedy Samantha will receive.
B) The $100 will be deducted from the $400 Maddie owes leaving Maddie owing Samantha $300.
C) Samantha will be allowed to keep the $100 and is still entitled to receive $400 from Samantha.
D) Because of the extra work involved, Samantha will be required to deduct only half of the $100 from Maddie's debt, leaving Maddie owing $350.
E) After the $100 is deducted, Samantha and Maddie will be required under the UCC to split the difference leaving Maddie owing $150.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) keep the proceeds as the benefit of the bargain, but cannot cancel the contract.
B) cancel the contract and to seek remedies that give them the benefit of the bargain.
C) rescind the contract and seek punitive damages.
D) refuse the goods immediately and sue for punitive damages.
E) receive the benefit of the bargain plus 25% of the expected profits.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No because Josef did not breach the contract.
B) No because the damages are too speculative.
C) No because you can never obtain compensation for lost profits in contract cases
D) Yes, because the $1,000 is an appropriate amount of punitive damages.
E) Yes, because the $1,000 is a consequential damage of breach.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That consequential damages may be limited or excluded unless the limitation or exclusion benefits one party over the other.
B) That consequential damages may be limited or excluded unless the limitation or exclusion is unconscionable.
C) That consequential damages may be limited but not excluded entirely.
D) That consequential damages may be limited or excluded entirely unless any type of breach of warranty is involved in which case consequential damages may be limited but not excluded.
E) That consequential damages may be limited or excluded entirely unless any type of breach of warranty is involved in which case consequential damages may be neither limited nor excluded.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Specific performance was unavailable because real estate was not involved.
B) Specific performance was unavailable because a foreign defendant was involved and jurisdiction for specific performance was, therefore, lacking.
C) Specific performance was unavailable because the goods at issue were scarce.
D) Specific performance was unavailable because a requirements contract was involved.
E) Specific performance was the appropriate remedy because the goods at issue were unique with no known alternative sources of supply.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Nominal performance
B) Absolute performance
C) Specific performance
D) Diligent performance
E) True performance
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The UCC only allows buyers and lessees to seek the remedy of specific performance when goods are unique.
B) The UCC only allows buyers and lessees to seek the remedy of specific performance when a remedy at law is inadequate.
C) The UCC only allows buyers and lessees to seek the remedy of specific performance when goods are worth more than $500.
D) The UCC allows buyers and lessees to seek the remedy of specific performance when goods are unique, when a remedy at law is inadequate, or when goods are worth more than $500.
E) The UCC allows buyers and lessees to seek the remedy of specific performance when goods are unique or when a remedy at law is inadequate.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A seller cannot reclaim goods ever.
B) As soon as the buyer is late on a payment.
C) Within 48 hours of the buyer being late on their payment.
D) When the buyer is at least 10 days late on a payment
E) When the seller discovers the buyer is insolvent.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A limitation of consequential damages for commercial losses is acceptable so long as both parties are represented by an attorney.
B) A limitation of consequential damages for commercial losses is acceptable so long as any consumer was represented by an attorney.
C) A limitation of consequential damages for commercial losses is prima facie unconscionable.
D) A limitation of consequential damages for commercial losses is analyzed in the same way as a limitation of consequential damages for personal injury.
E) A limitation of consequential damages for commercial losses is not prima facie unconscionable.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) To deter parties from breaching their contracts.
B) To compensate breach victims.
C) To enforce social order.
D) To punish parties from breaching contracts
E) To provide a private system of justice
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The right to put a lien on the lessee.
B) The right to sue the lessee under federal law.
C) The right to bring a tort action
D) The right to reclaim the goods
E) No remedy is provided and common law contract remedies will suffice.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 80 of 90
Related Exams