Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Because it determines which contracts are considered fraudulent.
B) Because it determines which contracts are voidable.
C) Because it determines which contracts lack consideration.
D) Because it determines how much may be awarded in damages under a contract.
E) Because it determines whether punitive damages may be awarded.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, if it was a basis for Ky's agreeing to enter into the contract.
B) No, because the mistake was in the financial information.
C) Yes, because only one party must show that the mistake was not what was intended.
D) Yes, because Ky made a mutual mistake.
E) No, because the mistake is not mutual since only Ky, and not Roland, was adversely affected.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) It is illegal to force a party to sign a disclaimer about representations made, and thus defendants were allowed to proceed with their counterclaim.
B) The disclaimer was invalid and thus defendants were allowed to proceed with their counterclaim.
C) The counterclaim was dismissed because the disclaimer in the contract prohibited defendants from filing a claim.
D) The counterclaim was dismissed even though the disclaimer was invalid.
E) The counterclaim was dismissed because, in response to a disclaimer in the contract, defendant affirmed that certain representations were not made.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) illegal
B) void
C) irregular
D) implied
E) voidable
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Jen may rescind the contract and recover compensatory damages.
B) Jen may rescind the contract, but she may not recover damages.
C) Jen may sue for damages, but she may not rescind the contract.
D) Jen may rescind the contract, or she may keep the contract and sue for damages.
E) Jen has no remedy based on an innocent misrepresentation based on the theory that she should have checked more closely before entering into the contract.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) breach of duty
B) negligence
C) duress
D) coercion
E) manipulation
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That Omar knew of the change of teacher and bore the risk of mistake.
B) That only a unilateral mistake was involved on Omar's behalf because Monica was aware of the change and, therefore, Omar is not entitled to a discharge.
C) That a mutual mistake was involved and that Omar is, therefore, not entitled to a refund.
D) That transactions involving goods are not subject to the defense of mistake.
E) That she did not commit fraud and, therefore, Omar is not entitled to rescission.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) special places clause
B) legal assent clause
C) disclaimer
D) consideration clause
E) disruption clause
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) should have known he or she was committing negligence
B) should have known the truth using the skills and competence required of a regular person
C) verified the truth and negligently continued with the false statement
D) should have known the truth
E) should have known the truth using the skills and competence required of a person in his position or profession
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A special Consumer Contracts Law was developed to place consumers and businesses on a more equal footing in transactions.
B) The Civil Code has more lax requirements regarding fraud than the country's Consumer Contracts law.
C) The goal in regard to consumers is to form the law so that in litigation businesses are at a distinct disadvantage in regard to consumers.
D) In order to encourage economic advancement and international investment, the goal is to form the law so that in litigation consumers are at a distinct disadvantage in comparison to businesses.
E) Japanese law does not recognize rights of consumers as the buyer must beware.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) illegal
B) rescinded
C) unallowed
D) assigned
E) rewritten
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) European courts are in total disagreement with the reluctance of American courts to interfere with a contract because the value of the item in question has changed since the agreement.
B) European courts refuse to assume that parties accept the risk when they make a contract that the value might change later.
C) European courts permit rescission of the contract for a mistake of value when the mistake involves more than 10 percent of the value at the time of the contract.
D) European courts permit rescission of the contract for a mistake of value when the mistake involves more than 40 percent of the value at the time of the contract.
E) European courts permit rescission of the contract for a mistake of value when the mistake involves more than 50 percent of the value at the time of the contract.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Duress
B) Unconscionability
C) Fraud
D) Undue influence
E) Consumer misbehavior
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, they are identical. The contract is void as a matter of law.
B) Yes, they are identical. The contract can be rescinded.
C) Yes, they are identical. The contract can be rescinded, but the misled party cannot sue for damages.
D) No, in negligent misrepresentation, the contract is void. In a case of fraudulent misrepresentation, the contract can be rescinded.
E) No, in fraudulent misrepresentation, the contract is void. In a case of negligent misrepresentation, the contract can be rescinded.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 21 - 40 of 90
Related Exams