Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

Can consumers take legal action against a company for misrepresentation of their products?


A) Yes, if marketing materials, such as advertising, product labels, and packaging, are seen as misrepresenting what a product truly is or what benefits the product offers.
B) Yes, but only if the product labels misrepresent what the product offers.
C) Yes, but one cannot sue for inaccurate packaging or product labels.
D) Consumers cannot sue companies for misrepresentation of their products.
E) Consumers can only sue companies for misrepresentation of their products when there is a statute or public policy in place.

F) B) and E)
G) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

For a valid contract, courts insist on a ________.


A) meeting of the parties
B) meeting of the minds
C) mutual meeting
D) contractual meeting
E) meeting of assent

F) A) and D)
G) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Kellen and Thomas are mistaken as to the facts surrounding their contract. What is absent when a mistake of fact occurs?


A) Legal analysis
B) Mutual understanding
C) Joint participation
D) Contractual concurrence
E) Legal assent

F) C) and E)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Threatening physical harm or extortion to gain consent to a contract is classified as duress.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Georgia and Dillard are both confused about a material fact in their current contract. Either party can choose to ________ the contract at this point.


A) rescind
B) realign
C) unilaterally rewrite
D) disclaim
E) discard

F) C) and D)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is true regarding the effect of an innocent misrepresentation on a contract?


A) It permits the party that was misled by the false statement to rescind the contract, but damages are not available.
B) It permits the party who made the false statement to rescind the contract.
C) It permits either the party that was misled by the false statement or the party who made the false statement to rescind the contract.
D) The contract is automatically void and of no effect, and the party who was misled may recover damages.
E) It permits either the party that was misled by the false statement or the party who made the false statement to rescind the contract, and it also makes the contract void and of no effect.

F) B) and E)
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

[Scheming 'Friends'] Richard wants to rent a basement apartment in Eric's home. Richard threatens to tell Eric's parents that Eric had been arrested for illegally smoking marijuana unless Eric rents the apartment to him for $100 per month. (The information regarding the arrest is true.) Eric reluctantly agrees to rent the apartment to Richard for $100 per month. Richard also wants to buy Eric's car. Eric runs back the odometer on the car before Richard looks at it. Richard is impressed by the low mileage and agrees to buy the car. Eric offers to sell Richard a ring for Richard's fiancée. Eric tells Richard that the ring is a diamond and believes that to be true. After the deal is made, however, a jeweler friend of Eric informs him that the ring is a fake. When Richard shows up with the money, Eric says nothing. He just hands Richard the ring and takes the money. Later, Richard finds out that the odometer was run backwards from another friend in whom Eric confided. Richard also finds out from his girlfriend that the ring is a fake. -Which is the correct legal term, if any, for Eric's action in regard to running back the odometer?


A) Concealment.
B) Nondisclosure.
C) Active duress.
D) Conscious disregard.
E) There is no legal term because although he acted illegally, Richard had no duty to disclose his action and incriminate himself.

F) B) and C)
G) D) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

When ________ is at issue, the free will needed for legal consent has been removed by the specifics of a threat.


A) duress
B) master manipulation
C) fraud
D) undue influence
E) stealing

F) D) and E)
G) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

[Scheming 'Friends'] Richard wants to rent a basement apartment in Eric's home. Richard threatens to tell Eric's parents that Eric had been arrested for illegally smoking marijuana unless Eric rents the apartment to him for $100 per month. (The information regarding the arrest is true.) Eric reluctantly agrees to rent the apartment to Richard for $100 per month. Richard also wants to buy Eric's car. Eric runs back the odometer on the car before Richard looks at it. Richard is impressed by the low mileage and agrees to buy the car. Eric offers to sell Richard a ring for Richard's fiancée. Eric tells Richard that the ring is a diamond and believes that to be true. After the deal is made, however, a jeweler friend of Eric informs him that the ring is a fake. When Richard shows up with the money, Eric says nothing. He just hands Richard the ring and takes the money. Later, Richard finds out that the odometer was run backwards from another friend in whom Eric confided. Richard also finds out from his girlfriend that the ring is a fake. -Which statement is true regarding Richard's rights in regards to the car purchase?


A) He will not be able to rescind the contract because Eric made no affirmative statements.
B) He will not be able to rescind the contract unless he can prove that he expressly asked Eric if the mileage was run backwards on the car, and Eric failed to reveal that the odometer had been altered.
C) He will not be able to rescind the contract because the mileage alteration did not affect the engine of the car.
D) He will be able to rescind the contract because of duress practiced by Eric.
E) He will be able to rescind the contract because of the fraudulent misrepresentation on the part of Eric.

F) D) and E)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Generally, neither the European courts nor the U.S. courts will interfere with a contract just because the value of the item in question has changed since the agreement.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

[Elton's Electronics] Elton's Electronics sells electronic housewares. Elton is looking for a new supplier to produce the standard-sized switchplate for its best-selling blender. He contacts Porter and provides Porter with specifications for where the switches on the switchplate should be placed. Porter provides excellent pricing and delivery terms, which would save Elton a lot of money. Elton and Porter sign a contract for Porter to produce 10,000 standard-sized switchplates according to Elton's specifications. When the completed switchplates arrive, Elton's employees attach them to the blenders, however, the standard-sized switchplates are two millimeters too long. Elton is furious and calls Porter, who says Elton can send back the switchplates and Porter's company can rework them, but there will be a fee because the switchplates he shipped were "standard-size" switchplates, as specified in the contract. Elton disagrees and hangs up the phone. Elton's technician measures both the switchplates and the blender and discovers that the blender face where the switchplate is attached is two millimeters shorter than the well-known "standard-size" switchplate. The technician suggests they could shave off two millimeters from Porter's boards to make them fit on the blenders, however, it would be a lot of work. -Under which of the following scenarios would a court most likely invalidate the contract with Porter?


A) If Porter knew the "standard-size" switchplates were not the proper size for Elton's blenders, and Elton's mistake in calculating the size needed was a clerical error.
B) If Elton's technician "eyeballed" the size needed for the blender.
C) If Elton wrote the wrong switchplate size in an email to Porter and that size was the same as the standard size.
D) If Elton's mistake in measuring the size of the switchplate needed was a clerical error.
E) If Elton assumed the switchplate was the standard size.

F) B) and D)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In which of the following examples would a court be least likely to find that nondisclosure has the same legal effect as an actual false assertion?


A) One of the parties to the contract is the other's doctor.
B) The contract involves a sale of a car with bad brakes.
C) Caroline fails to inform Vito of the recent outbreak of rust on her "rust-free" car that Vito had already agreed to purchase.
D) Despite the state's mandatory disclosure law, Vito fails to mention the mold in his basement.
E) Vito permits magazine orders to ship that are missing some pages.

F) A) and E)
G) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Marco threatens to file a criminal lawsuit against Nadine unless she agrees to the terms of a contract that Nadine knows to be ethically and morally against the company's policy. This is a situation involving ________.


A) undue influence
B) persuasive influence
C) demonstrable fraud
D) duress
E) manipulation

F) A) and B)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What was the result in the Peerless case discussed in the text in which there were two ships named Peerless and the parties disagreed over which ship was the subject of the contract?


A) The court rescinded the contract.
B) The court ruled that the older ship would be identified to the contract.
C) The court ruled that the newer ship would be identified to the contract.
D) The court ruled that the defendant would be allowed to choose which ship would be identified to the contract.
E) The court ruled that the plaintiff would be allowed to choose which ship would be identified to the contract.

F) All of the above
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Pedro intentionally failed to provide Anda with pertinent information that was material to a projected contract they were about to enter into. This is known as ________.


A) manipulation
B) nondisclosure
C) intentional deceitfulness
D) purposeful availment
E) enforcement

F) All of the above
G) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The rules about legal assent were developed to show courts which party is at fault in a contract dispute.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Although there are some exceptions, a[n] ________ mistake does not generally void a contract.


A) Unclear
B) Mutual
C) Unilateral
D) Clear
E) Single

F) A) and B)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What does an injured plaintiff need to prove to a court in order to claim duress?


A) Plaintiff must claim that they were threatened with physical violence.
B) Plaintiff must demonstrate that the threat left no reasonable alternatives and that the free will necessary for legal consent was removed by the specifics of the threat.
C) Plaintiff's duress claim must have an associated monetary value in order for a claim to be considered by a court.
D) Plaintiff must prove that there was no prior contractual arrangement between the parties.
E) Plaintiff only need show there was some ascertainable harm that would happen in the future.

F) All of the above
G) D) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What must a party prove in order to obtain money damages based on a fraudulent misrepresentation when damages are sought?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

(1) A false statement about a past or ex...

View Answer

Set forth the exceptions that would permit a court to invalidate a contract on grounds of unilateral mistake.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

(1) One party made a mistake about a mat...

View Answer

Showing 61 - 80 of 90

Related Exams

Show Answer