A) Independent contracts
B) Substantive contracts
C) Adhesion contracts
D) Justifiable contracts
E) Severable contracts
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) If Zeb provides a spreadsheet of his payments with DigiTV.
B) Zeb's contract with SatTV is voidable because it is a contract with a mentally incapacitated person.
C) If Zeb's delusions persuaded him to sign the contract with SatTV so he could contact the planet Zaltar and return home.
D) If Zeb shows that he no longer believes he is from the planet Zaltar.
E) If Zeb shows that he miscalculated his savings with SatTV.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) void
B) enforceable
C) voidable
D) illegal and unenforceable
E) valid because it is contrary to public policy to limit a professional's right to work
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) the court's permission to contract
B) intent
C) the mental ability to understand his or her rights and obligations under a contract
D) opportunity and ability
E) consideration
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, because Calvin is working for a competitor.
B) Yes, because Calvin is working for a competitor and his employment contract specifically states that it remains in effect if the business is sold to a new owner.
C) Yes, because Calvin is working for a competitor, his employment contract specifically states that it remains in effect if the business is sold to a new owner, and the covenant not to compete is reasonable.
D) Yes, because the covenant not to compete protects a legitimate business interest.
E) No, because the covenant not to compete does not contain a period of time and geographic area that are reasonable.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) valid because it is not illegal.
B) valid if consideration was paid to Dorian.
C) unenforceable because there is no way for Julie to disaffirm the contract.
D) unenforceable because Dorian would be committing the tort of defamation.
E) a court would have to determine whether or not there were enough damages to Julie's competitor to determine if the contract was void or valid.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) An agreement regarding gambling.
B) An agreement for an unlicensed attorney to perform legal work.
C) An employment contract that requires employees to work on the Sabbath.
D) An agreement regarding a usurious loan.
E) An agreement to publish a defamatory article about one's boss.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Void; disaffirm
B) Void; affirm
C) Void; resist
D) Voidable; disaffirm
E) Voidable; affirm
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Substantive unconscionability.
B) Adhesion conscionability.
C) Procedural unconscionability.
D) Exculpatory clauses.
E) An in pari delicto agreement.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Emancipated
B) Freed
C) Released
D) Disaffirmed
E) Either freed or disaffirmed depending on the circumstances
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, as long as the disaffirmance is within a reasonable time after she reached the age of majority.
B) Yes, although making the payment constitutes an implied ratification of the contract, she may still void the contract as long as the disaffirmance is within a reasonable time after she reached the age of majority.
C) Yes, because courts recognize a public policy to protect minors who are naΓ―ve against others who may take advantage of them.
D) No, because making the payment constitutes an implied ratification of the contract, and once a contract is ratified, it is no longer voidable.
E) No, because her actions do not constitute a valid ratification.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, because parents are usually liable for a minor's personal torts.
B) No, but only because they were not aware of any misappropriation.
C) No, because in most states, minors, not their parents, are liable for a minor's personal torts.
D) No, even if there is evidence that her parents failed to properly supervise Cassandra, parents cannot be held liable for a minor's personal torts.
E) Yes, because all states recognize parental liability, regardless of proper supervision.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No, because he did not ratify the contract.
B) Yes, because, even though Zeb understands the nature of the contract and the obligations it imposes, Zeb did not disaffirm the contract within a reasonable period of time.
C) No, because contracts with mentally incapacitated persons are void, unless expressly ratified.
D) No, because contracts with mentally incapacitated persons are void.
E) Yes, although Zeb may suffer from mental problems, Zeb appears to still understand the nature of the contract and the obligations it imposes.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, all states have Sabbath laws that make it illegal to enter into a contract on a Sabbath day.
B) Yes, though not all states have Sabbath laws that make it illegal to enter into a contract on a Sabbath day, any contract created on a Sabbath day can be rescinded.
C) No, some Sabbath laws make it illegal to enter into a contract on a Sabbath day, however, fully performed contracts created on a Sabbath day cannot be rescinded.
D) No, all states have Sabbath laws that make it illegal to enter into a contract on a Sabbath day, however, fully performed contracts created on a Sabbath day cannot be rescinded.
E) No, but only because the contract was not fully executed.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Promise
B) Acceptance
C) Capacity
D) Intent
E) Affirmation
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) a court's permission
B) 4 years of college
C) a license
D) the state's permission
E) a union's permission
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 21 - 40 of 90
Related Exams