A) A competition agreement
B) A prohibited competition agreement
C) A covenant not to misappropriate
D) A policy agreement
E) A covenant not to compete
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) discharged
B) still enforceable
C) executed
D) void because it is illegal
E) exempt
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Substantive unconscionability.
B) Adhesion conscionability.
C) Procedural unconscionability.
D) Exculpatory clauses.
E) An in pari delicto agreement.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Zeb's sister has the sole legal capacity to enter into contracts on Zeb's behalf and any contract Zeb enters into is void.
B) Zeb's sister may enter into contracts on Zeb's behalf, but only with Zeb's affirmance.
C) Both Zeb and his sister have capacity to enter into contracts, however, any contract Zeb enters into may be disaffirmed by Zeb.
D) Zeb may enter into contracts, but they may be disaffirmed by his sister.
E) Zeb may enter into contracts, but they are voidable by his sister.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Implied ratification
B) Express ratification
C) Express novation
D) Implied novation
E) Express ratification if the statement is in writing but nothing if the statement is only oral
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Substantive unconscionability
B) Unclear drafting
C) Procedural unconscionability
D) Outrageous wording
E) Adhesion conscionability
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That if a competent party relies on a misrepresentation in good faith, the minor gives up the right to disaffirm the agreement.
B) That the minor must restore the competent party to that party's precontractual position before obtaining the disaffirmance.
C) That the minor may disaffirm but that the competent party has the right to sue the minor in tort and recover damages for fraud.
D) That misrepresentation does not affect the minor's right to disaffirm the contract.
E) That misrepresentation results in the minor receiving a return of only half the consideration he or she supplied.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) So long as, after reaching the age of majority, Rose did not state orally or in writing that she intended to be bound by the contract, then she did not commit an express ratification.
B) Rose was required to expressly ratify the contract before she could be bound to it.
C) An implied ratification occurs when parents agree to accept the debt entered into by a minor.
D) If Rose caused any damage whatsoever to the car, she was said to have impliedly ratified the contract.
E) Rose was required to expressly ratify the contract before she could be bound to it so long as no damage was done; but if she did any damage to the car, as a matter of law, she is said to have impliedly ratified it.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Covenant not to compete
B) Necessary covenant
C) Employment completion agreement
D) Covenant of good faith agreement
E) Covenant of favored employment
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Peri would likely be successful because covenants not to compete in conjunction with the sale of a business are generally not enforceable.
B) Peri would likely be successful because, although covenants not to compete in conjunction with the sale of a business are generally enforceable, Lisette's contract was unreasonable in that it would have restricted Peri from opening any business.
C) Peri would likely be successful because covenants not to compete in employment contracts are generally enforceable and Lisette's contract was for a reasonable length of time and a reasonable location.
D) Lisette would likely be successful because covenants not to compete in conjunction with the sale of a business are generally enforceable and Lisette's contract was for a reasonable length of time and a reasonable location.
E) Lisette would likely be successful because covenants not to compete in employment contracts are generally enforceable and Lisette's contract was for a reasonable length of time and a reasonable location.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Rent.
B) Psychologist
C) Monthly credit card bill for electricity.
D) Credit card bill for monthly gym membership.
E) Winter boots.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, because the disaffirmance occurred within one month of reaching the age of majority.
B) Yes, because the disaffirmance occurred within six months of reaching the age of majority.
C) The court did not find the disaffirmance to be reasonable.
D) No, because the plaintiff could have disaffirmed the contract when he was under the age of majority but chose not to do so.
E) Yes, because the type of contract at issue was an arbitration agreement.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) procedurally unconscionable contract
B) expressly oppressive contract
C) outrageously invalid contract
D) adhesion contract
E) enforceable agreement
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Showing 61 - 80 of 90
Related Exams