Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

List and explain the four different types of privacy torts.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The four privacy torts are (1) false lig...

View Answer

What did the court rule in regard to the plaintiff's claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress in Olson v. CenturyLink, the case in the text in which the plaintiff alleged that representatives of the defendant, a provider of telephone services, wrongly failed to process his application, disconnected his telephone service, and hung up on him during telephone conversations?


A) That the conduct complained of by the plaintiff failed to meet the level of conduct required for a finding of the intentional infliction of emotional distress.
B) That the plaintiff's complaint regarding the disconnection of his telephone service was sufficient to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress but that the plaintiff's other allegations were insufficient to support an award based on the tort of the intentional infliction of emotional distress.
C) That the plaintiff's complaint regarding the refusal to process his application was sufficient to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress but that the plaintiff's other allegations were insufficient to support an award based on the tort of the intentional infliction of emotional distress.
D) That the plaintiff's complaint regarding representatives hanging up on him were sufficient to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress but that the plaintiff's other allegations were insufficient to support an award based on the tort of the intentional infliction of emotional distress.
E) That the plaintiff would be allowed to proceed as to all allegations because they were all adequate to support a verdict based on the intentional infliction of emotional distress.

F) C) and D)
G) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

[Feuding Neighbors] Taylor is angry because her neighbor, Jon, allows his dog to chase her cat, so she decides to get even. She moves a number of farm animals into her backyard and begins playing music at all hours of the night. She also steals a nice lawn chair from Jon's deck. She intends to keep the chair and not give it back. Taylor further takes a rake off of Jon's deck that she plans to return after she finishes raking her leaves. Jon did not give her permission to take the rake or the chair. Jon is not happy about the farm animals and the loud music. -Which claim would Jon have against Taylor for taking the lawn chair?


A) Trespass to property.
B) Conversion.
C) Private nuisance.
D) Negligence.
E) Harassment.

F) C) and E)
G) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A reporter receives information from several highly credible sources that a famous actress is pregnant and that the father of the baby is not her husband. The story is later proved untrue. The actress sues for defamation. Is she likely to be successful?


A) Yes, because the printed story would be likely to damage the reputation of the actress.
B) Yes, because the printed story turned out to be untrue.
C) Yes, because pregnancy is a private matter even for public figures.
D) No, because the allegations would be unlikely to damage a person's reputation.
E) No, because the reporter did not act with actual malice.

F) A) and B)
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What type of tort occurs when the defendant takes an action intending certain consequences will result or knowing certain consequences are likely to result?


A) Criminal
B) Liability
C) Intentional
D) Negligent
E) Strict-liability

F) C) and D)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following occurs when an individual is confined or restrained against his or her will for an appreciable period of time?


A) Forcible detention.
B) False imprisonment.
C) Qualified imprisonment.
D) Contained detention.
E) False detention.

F) D) and E)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

When only a prospective contract exists, simply offering a better deal is not enough to create liability for intentional interference with contract.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following occurs when someone engages in outrageous, intentional conduct likely to cause extreme emotional distress to the party toward whom the conduct is directed?


A) Negligent infliction of emotional distress.
B) Intentional infliction of strict-liability distress.
C) Intentional infliction of emotional distress.
D) Reckless invasion of solitude.
E) Psychological infliction of distress.

F) A) and D)
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

[Hair Stylist Woes] Ryan, a college student, went to see his hair stylist, Melissa. Ryan, who had black, curly hair, requested straight, blond hair. Melissa told him that she could make those changes, but that there would be significant upkeep involved. Melissa made the changes, but Ryan did not do the upkeep required. Ryan proceeded to falsely claim that Melissa did not do what Ryan asked her to do, that Melissa lied to him, and that Melissa was professionally incompetent. Ryan made the statements about Melissa to friends of his. He also wrote a letter to his college newspaper saying that Melissa's shop should be avoided at all costs because Melissa was incompetent. In fact, Melissa was a good hair stylist and enjoyed a good reputation up until the time that Ryan started his criticism. Melissa threatened to sue Ryan for defamation, but Ryan told Melissa that she could not prevail because she could not prove loss of income. Melissa had to admit that while her reputation had been damaged somewhat and she felt embarrassed and humiliated, the damage was primarily among the college population. Her income kept increasing from other segments of the community, and she had suffered no net loss. All her appointment times were booked for weeks ahead. -Statements made by Ryan to his friends that were defamatory of Melissa are what type of defamation?


A) Slander but not libel.
B) Libel but not slander.
C) Both libel and slander.
D) No tort was committed because the statements were made only to friends of Ryan, not to business acquaintances of Melissa.
E) No tort was committed because the falsehood involved matters of appearance, not business-related matters.

F) C) and D)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Ashley is unhappy with her neighbor, Josh, because Josh is pressing charges against her for repeatedly trespassing on his property. She tells him that unless he drops the charges, she will bring an action against him for nuisance because he plays his stereo late at night at times. While the stereo does not bother Ashley because she is up late anyway, she thinks that will encourage Josh to drop the trespassing charges. Josh, however, continues to press charges, and Ashley proceeds to sue Josh for nuisance. Which of the following is true?


A) Ashley is completely within her rights and has done nothing wrong because Josh really is playing the stereo late at night.
B) Josh can sue Ashley for malicious prosecution and win only if he wins the nuisance action.
C) Josh can sue Ashley for abuse of process and win only if he wins the nuisance action.
D) Josh can sue Ashley for malicious prosecution and win regardless of whether or not he wins the nuisance action.
E) Josh can sue Ashley for abuse of process and win regardless of whether or not she wins the nuisance action.

F) All of the above
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A reporter does not like a candidate for president and he publishes a made up story about the candidate having an affair. Did the reporter commit a tort?


A) Yes, because the reporter acted with actual malice.
B) No, because the candidate for president is a public figure.
C) No, because the story was made up and unlikely to be believed.
D) No, because having an affair would not harm the reputation of a presidential candidate.
E) No, because politicians cannot be defamed.

F) A) and E)
G) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is true of a negligence tort?


A) A defendant commits a negligence tort when he subjects someone to a reasonable risk of harm.
B) A defendant commits a negligence tort when he is careless to someone else's detriment.
C) A defendant commits a negligence tort when he forms intent to cause harm but causes a different type of harm.
D) A defendant commits a negligence tort when he accidentally engages in a criminal act and someone is hurt.
E) A defendant commits a negligence tort only if he commits an inherently dangerous action which can never be safe.

F) B) and D)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

An assault victim sues the person who assaulted her. The court awards her $10,000 to pay for her actual medical expenses, to compensate her for time missed from work, and to compensate her for her pain. The $10,000 is an example of what type of damages?


A) Nominal
B) Compensatory
C) Punitive
D) Retaliatory
E) Revenge

F) None of the above
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Defamation can be a civil or criminal action in China.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is not an example of compensatory damages?


A) Payment for the plaintiff's medical bills for surgery resulting from the injuries caused by an intentional tort.
B) Payment for medical bills for pain killers the plaintiff was prescribed to cope with the pain from an intentional tort.
C) Payment for the pain the plaintiff endured as a result of an intentional tort.
D) Payment for lost wages due to time the plaintiff had to take off from work due to injuries sustained as a result of an intentional tort.
E) Payment for attorney fees the plaintiff incurred filing a lawsuit to get compensation for injuries resulting from an intentional tort.

F) A) and B)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The word "tort" means which of the following?


A) It is an English word meaning "accidental."
B) It is a German word meaning "malfeasance."
C) It is a Latin word meaning "misfeasance."
D) It is a French word meaning "wrong."
E) It is a civil law term meaning "liability."

F) D) and E)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Mark and Jillian are business partners that decide to go their separate ways. As they are selling the business assets, Mark intentionally destroys two of the display cabinets that Jillian was taking with her to her new business. Jillian would sue Mark for ________.


A) punitive damages
B) compensatory damages
C) nominal damages
D) consequential damages
E) property damages

F) A) and D)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

If someone is overly fearful, is that person assaulted every time he experiences apprehension?


A) Yes, because assault only requires apprehension regardless of whether it is reasonable.
B) Yes, because assault is judged on the basis of the victim's level of apprehension only.
C) Yes, because it is necessary to take a person's level of fear into account when interacting with that person.
D) No, because assault requires unwanted physical contact.
E) No, because assault requires reasonable apprehension.

F) D) and E)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

[Feuding Neighbors] Taylor is angry because her neighbor, Jon, allows his dog to chase her cat, so she decides to get even. She moves a number of farm animals into her backyard and begins playing music at all hours of the night. She also steals a nice lawn chair from Jon's deck. She intends to keep the chair and not give it back. Taylor further takes a rake off of Jon's deck that she plans to return after she finishes raking her leaves. Jon did not give her permission to take the rake or the chair. Jon is not happy about the farm animals and the loud music. -Which of these would be the most appropriate cause of action, if any, against Taylor based upon the farm animals and the music?


A) Trespass to property.
B) Harassment.
C) Private nuisance.
D) Negligence.
E) No cause of action is appropriate because Taylor is entitled to use her property as she sees fit.

F) A) and B)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What, if any, defenses are available to a person who has been accused of defamation?


A) Truth and privilege.
B) Privilege but not truth.
C) Truth but not privilege.
D) Purposeful and negligence.
E) There are no defenses to defamation.

F) A) and B)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 41 - 60 of 90

Related Exams

Show Answer