A) Nominal
B) Compensatory
C) Punitive
D) Retaliatory
E) Revenge
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Nominal
B) Compensatory
C) Punitive
D) Retaliatory
E) Revenge
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The severity of the wrongful conduct and the wealth of the defendant.
B) The fact the defendant is wealthy and that the victim was an employee.
C) The severity of the defendant's conduct and the fact the victim was an employee.
D) The length of service the butler provided to the defendant and the wealth of the defendant.
E) The wealth disparity between the butler and the wealthy defendant.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Lizzy could sue for assault.
B) Lizzy could sue for battery.
C) Lizzy could sue for assault and battery.
D) Lizzy could sue for negligence since Bobby missed punching her.
E) Lizzy could not sue for a tort as no harm came from his threatening to punch her.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The Internet Communications Act of 2000.
B) The Interactive Computer Services Protection Act of 2004.
C) The Communications Decency Act of 1996.
D) The Internet Communications Protection Act of 1998.
E) The Blog Protection Act of 2001.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Assault only
B) Battery only
C) Assault and battery
D) Assault, battery, and strict liability
E) Penny's conduct does not constitute an assault because Jose was not afraid.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No tort was committed, Jamal was Matt's target not Sally.
B) The tort of negligence because Matt only intended to harm Jamal.
C) An accidental tort because Matt struck Sally by mistake.
D) An intentional tort because even though Matt meant to hit Jamal, he still caused harm by hitting Sally.
E) A strict liability tort occurred because throwing a baseball is inherently dangerous.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Threatening to use immediate physical force to detain someone; refusing to release property; or physical restraint, such as tying someone to a chair; but not moral pressure.
B) Threatening to use immediate physical force to detain someone; physical restraint, such as tying someone to a chair; or moral pressure; but not refusing to release property.
C) Physical restraint, such as tying someone to a chair; but not threatening to use immediate physical force to detain someone; refusing to release property; or moral pressure.
D) Threatening to use immediate physical force to detain someone; refusing to release property; physical restraint, such as tying someone to a chair; and moral pressure.
E) Physical restraint; threatening to use immediate physical force; but not refusing to release property; or moral pressure.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) By shoving her in the back, Daniel committed a battery.
B) By shoving her in the back, Daniel committed a battery and an assault.
C) By shoving her in the back, Daniel committed an assault.
D) Daniel did not commit any torts because he did not actually physically harm Min-ji.
E) Daniel did not commit any torts because he can rely on the self-defense theory.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Attributing characteristics or beliefs to a person that he or she does not possess.
B) Disclosing private facts about a person in order to obtain some sort of personal gain.
C) Defaming a person with actual malice.
D) Defaming a public figure.
E) Defaming a public figure for personal gain.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Ryan is correct.
B) Ryan is correct only if he can establish that he did not intend to cause economic loss to Melissa.
C) Ryan is incorrect because his actions would be considered libel per se.
D) Ryan is incorrect because general damages would be presumed.
E) Ryan is incorrect because Melissa has proven special damages.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Ryan is correct.
B) Ryan is correct only if he can show that he did not intend to cause Melissa loss of income.
C) Ryan is incorrect because his statements constituted slander per se.
D) Ryan is incorrect because special damages will be presumed.
E) Ryan is incorrect but only because Melissa cannot establish libel per se.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Carlos has committed the tort of unfair competition.
B) Carlos has committed the tort of interference with contract.
C) Carlos has committed the tort of unfair competition and also the tort of interference with contract.
D) Carlos has committed the tort of disparagement.
E) Carlos has not committed any tort.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) To give special protections from defamation to public figures since they are in the public eye and their reputations matter more to them than the average person.
B) To encourage free discussion about public figures.
C) To discourage discussion about politicians so democracy can function in a more orderly fashion.
D) To allow people to make up stories about politicians and celebrities because these public figures are people of interest to the public.
E) To prevent people from making a profit by slandering public figures.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 80 of 90
Related Exams