Filters
Question type
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Research on the persuasiveness of eyewitness testimony has revealed several important findings. First, it has been demonstrated that eyewitness testimony can be highly persuasive to jurors, even when it is unreliable. This is due to the fact that jurors often place a great deal of trust in the testimony of eyewitnesses, even though it may be subject to biases and inaccuracies.
Additionally, experiments have shown that the persuasiveness of eyewitness testimony can be influenced by a variety of factors, including the confidence with which the eyewitness delivers their testimony, the level of detail provided, and the presence of corroborating evidence. For example, eyewitnesses who appear confident and provide a high level of detail are generally perceived as more credible and persuasive.
Furthermore, research has also highlighted the potential for eyewitness testimony to be influenced by external factors, such as leading questions or post-event information. Experiments have demonstrated that the way in which questions are phrased can have a significant impact on the accuracy and persuasiveness of eyewitness testimony.
Overall, the research findings on the persuasiveness of eyewitness testimony emphasize the need for caution when evaluating the reliability of such testimony in legal settings. It is important for jurors and legal professionals to be aware of the potential for biases and inaccuracies in eyewitness testimony and to critically evaluate its persuasiveness in the context of other evidence and information available.
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Research on the persuasiveness of eyewitness testimony has revealed several important findings. First, it has been demonstrated that eyewitness testimony can be highly persuasive to jurors, even when it is unreliable. This is due to the fact that jurors often place a great deal of trust in the testimony of eyewitnesses, even though it may be subject to biases and inaccuracies.
Additionally, experiments have shown that the persuasiveness of eyewitness testimony can be influenced by a variety of factors, including the confidence with which the eyewitness delivers their testimony, the level of detail provided, and the presence of corroborating evidence. For example, eyewitnesses who appear confident and provide a high level of detail are generally perceived as more credible and persuasive.
Furthermore, research has also highlighted the potential for eyewitness testimony to be influenced by external factors, such as leading questions or post-event information. Experiments have demonstrated that the way in which questions are phrased can have a significant impact on the accuracy and persuasiveness of eyewitness testimony.
Overall, the research findings on the persuasiveness of eyewitness testimony emphasize the need for caution when evaluating the reliability of such testimony in legal settings. It is important for jurors and legal professionals to be aware of the potential for biases and inaccuracies in eyewitness testimony and to critically evaluate its persuasiveness in the context of other evidence and information available.
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The cognitive interview procedure is a method used by law enforcement to help eyewitnesses recall details of a crime or event more accurately. It involves a series of techniques designed to enhance the retrieval of information from memory, including asking open-ended questions, encouraging the witness to mentally recreate the scene, and using context reinstatement to help the witness remember specific details.
This procedure is beneficial in eyewitness testimony because it has been shown to improve the quantity and quality of information recalled by witnesses. By using open-ended questions, the cognitive interview allows witnesses to provide more detailed and accurate descriptions of events, which can be crucial in solving crimes and identifying suspects. Additionally, by encouraging witnesses to mentally recreate the scene and use context reinstatement, the cognitive interview helps to retrieve specific details that may have been initially forgotten or overlooked.
Overall, the cognitive interview procedure is beneficial in eyewitness testimony because it helps to improve the accuracy and reliability of witness accounts, ultimately aiding in the investigation and adjudication of criminal cases.
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The cognitive interview procedure is a method used by law enforcement to help eyewitnesses recall details of a crime or event more accurately. It involves a series of techniques designed to enhance the retrieval of information from memory, including asking open-ended questions, encouraging the witness to mentally recreate the scene, and using context reinstatement to help the witness remember specific details.
This procedure is beneficial in eyewitness testimony because it has been shown to improve the quantity and quality of information recalled by witnesses. By using open-ended questions, the cognitive interview allows witnesses to provide more detailed and accurate descriptions of events, which can be crucial in solving crimes and identifying suspects. Additionally, by encouraging witnesses to mentally recreate the scene and use context reinstatement, the cognitive interview helps to retrieve specific details that may have been initially forgotten or overlooked.
Overall, the cognitive interview procedure is beneficial in eyewitness testimony because it helps to improve the accuracy and reliability of witness accounts, ultimately aiding in the investigation and adjudication of criminal cases.
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The physical attractiveness of the defen...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The physical attractiveness of the defen...
View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Lineup procedures can be changed to impr...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Lineup procedures can be changed to impr...
View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Jurors' understanding can be increased t...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Jurors' understanding can be increased t...
View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
There are several constructive steps tha...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
There are several constructive steps tha...
View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The misinformation effect refers to the ...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The misinformation effect refers to the ...
View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Yes and no. The process of selecting a jury, known as voir dire, allows attorneys for both sides to question potential jurors about their backgrounds and beliefs. The goal is to ensure that the jury is as impartial as possible. Attorneys can challenge potential jurors and have them removed if they believe they would be biased. However, the idea of "picking the right jury" implies a level of manipulation or control over the jury's eventual decision, which is not the intent of the selection process. It's also important to note that people's biases and prejudices can be unconscious and not easily detected during voir dire. Therefore, while attorneys can attempt to select a fair and impartial jury, it's not guaranteed that they can always "pick the right jury" in terms of predicting the outcome of the trial.
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Yes and no. The process of selecting a jury, known as voir dire, allows attorneys for both sides to question potential jurors about their backgrounds and beliefs. The goal is to ensure that the jury is as impartial as possible. Attorneys can challenge potential jurors and have them removed if they believe they would be biased. However, the idea of "picking the right jury" implies a level of manipulation or control over the jury's eventual decision, which is not the intent of the selection process. It's also important to note that people's biases and prejudices can be unconscious and not easily detected during voir dire. Therefore, while attorneys can attempt to select a fair and impartial jury, it's not guaranteed that they can always "pick the right jury" in terms of predicting the outcome of the trial.
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Eyewitness testimony has long been consi...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Eyewitness testimony has long been consi...
View Answer
Showing 1 - 9 of 9
Related Exams