A) They are generally the same as lemon laws in the U.S.
B) They allow for replacement of defective parts but not a new car unless the plaintiff agrees to pay the difference between the amount received for the used car when sold and the amount charged for the new car.
C) They guarantee a buyer of a lemon a new car.
D) They guarantee the buyer of a lemon a return of all consideration.
E) Canada does not have a lemon law such as is known in the U.S. Instead, an arbitration program is run through which a buyer may lodge complaints.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court awarded the plaintiff lost profits based on the fact that lost profits are the default measure of damages under Article 2 of the UCC.
B) The court awarded the plaintiff the difference between the contract price less the market price plus incidental damages based on the fact that such damages were the default measure of damages under Article 2 of the UCC.
C) The court awarded the plaintiff lost profits in addition to the difference between the contract price less the market price plus incidental damages based on the fact that all such damages were the default measure of damages under Article 2 of the UCC.
D) The court awarded the plaintiff the value of the unsellable inventory it had due to the defendant's breach and also lost profits because the default measure (the difference between the contract price less the market price plus incidental damages) did not make the plaintiff whole.
E) The court awarded the plaintiff lost profits and also the value of the unsellable inventory it had due to the defendant's breach because the default measure (lost profits) did not make the plaintiff whole.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Nominal damages
B) Compensatory damages
C) Reliance damages
D) Liquidated damages
E) Consequential damages
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Once goods have been accepted, they may not be rejected.
B) A buyer has an absolute right within 10 days after delivery in which to revoke acceptance of nonconforming goods.
C) A buyer has an absolute right within 48 hours after delivery in which to revoke acceptance of nonconforming goods.
D) A buyer has an absolute right within 30 days after delivery in which to revoke acceptance of nonconforming goods.
E) While there is no set time limit, the UCC sometimes allows a buyer to revoke acceptance of nonconforming goods.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) When they seem to give one side a benefit.
B) When one party is a corporation.
C) When neither party is a corporation.
D) When one side was not represented by an attorney.
E) When the remedies fail in their essential purpose.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Suit for incidental damages
B) Cover
C) Liquidated damages
D) Resale
E) Suit for consequential damages
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A limitation of consequential damages for injury to the person is acceptable so long as both parties are represented by an attorney.
B) A limitation of consequential damages for injury to the person is acceptable so long as any consumer was represented by an attorney.
C) A limitation of consequential damages for injury to the person is prima facie unconscionable.
D) A limitation of consequential damages for injury to the person is analyzed in the same way as a limitation of consequential damages where the loss is commercial.
E) A limitation of consequential damages for injury to the person is acceptable so long as the injuries are not life threatening.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Apple laws
B) Lemon laws
C) Clunker laws
D) Roadside laws
E) Peach laws
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Usage of trade may not impose a remedy in the event of a breach.
B) Usage of trade may impose a remedy in the event of a breach but it may not impose an exclusive remedy.
C) Usage of trade may impose an exclusive remedy in the event of a breach.
D) Usage of trade may impose an exclusive remedy in the event of a breach only if both sides are represented by an attorney.
E) Usage of trade may impose an exclusive remedy in the event of a breach only if a contract signed by both parties specifically provides as such.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The UCC only allows buyers and lessees to seek the remedy of specific performance when goods are unique.
B) The UCC only allows buyers and lessees to seek the remedy of specific performance when a remedy at law is inadequate.
C) The UCC only allows buyers and lessees to seek the remedy of specific performance when goods are worth more than $500.
D) The UCC allows buyers and lessees to seek the remedy of specific performance when goods are unique, when a remedy at law is inadequate, or when goods are worth more than $500.
E) The UCC allows buyers and lessees to seek the remedy of specific performance when goods are unique or when a remedy at law is inadequate, but not because the goods are worth more than $500.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That specific performance was unavailable because real estate was not involved.
B) That specific performance was unavailable because a foreign defendant was involved and jurisdiction for specific performance was, therefore, lacking.
C) That specific performance was unavailable because the goods at issue were scarce.
D) That specific performance was unavailable because a requirements contract was involved.
E) That specific performance was the appropriate remedy because the goods at issue were unique with no known alternative sources of supply.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Roland is correct. Selina was required to deliver the furniture, but she retained the right to sue him for any deficiency.
B) Roland is correct but only because of the special UCC exception for consumer goods.
C) Roland is incorrect. Selina had a right to withhold the furniture.
D) Roland is incorrect but only if Selina can prove that she had no reason to believe that he was a credit risk prior to signing the contract of sale.
E) Roland is correct because of federal consumer protection laws.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Roland is correct. Selina had no right to sell the furniture, but she retained the right to sue him for any deficiency.
B) Roland is correct but only because of the special UCC exception for consumer goods.
C) Roland is incorrect. Selina had a right to resell the furniture.
D) Roland is incorrect but only if Selina can prove that she had no reason to believe that he was a credit risk prior to signing the contract of sale.
E) Roland is correct because of federal consumer protection laws.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Obligations of parties are determined by the terms the parties outline in agreements, but not by custom or rules outlined by the UCC.
B) Obligations of parties are determined by the rules outlined by the UCC, but not by terms the parties outline in agreements or by custom.
C) Obligations of parties are determined by terms the parties outline in agreements and rules outlined by the Uniform Commercial Code, but not by custom.
D) Obligations of parties are determined by the rules outlined by the UCC and by custom, but not by terms the parties outline in agreements.
E) Obligations of parties are determined by the terms the parties outline in agreements, custom, and rules outlined by the UCC.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, Trudy is correct but only because a consumer transaction with a nonmerchant is involved.
B) Yes, but only because the fixtures were incorporated into real property.
C) Yes, because that is the only remedy she must provide under any circumstances.
D) Yes, but only because the fixtures had not yet been paid for by the buyer.
E) No, because Theresa had the right to revoke acceptance and cover.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 41 - 60 of 66
Related Exams