A) Unreasonable
B) Outrageous
C) Unconscionable
D) Unrealistic
E) Unbelievable
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Substantive unconscionability.
B) Adhesion conscionability.
C) Procedural unconscionability.
D) Exculpatory clauses.
E) An in pari delicto agreement.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court dismissed the lawsuit on the basis that the parents were bound by the Terms of Service and notifications of their original contracts with Apple binding them to future purchases of game currency when their passwords were used.
B) The court dismissed the lawsuit on the basis that the parents were bound by the Terms of Service and notifications of their original contracts with Apple binding them to future purchases of game currency regardless of whether passwords were used.
C) The court dismissed the lawsuit on the basis that no contractual agreement was needed in order for the parents to be bound in regard to purchases of game currency so long as their passwords were used.
D) The court refused to dismiss the lawsuit because no case law was provided to prove that Apple's Terms of Service served as a contract for all subsequent transactions.
E) The court refused to dismiss the lawsuit because as a matter of law parents cannot be required to contractually agree to future purchases by children that are unapproved by the parents.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Executed
B) Enforceable without a fine
C) Illegal and unenforceable
D) Enforceable but with a fine
E) Usury
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) In pari delicto
B) Procedurally unconscionable
C) An adhesion contract
D) A res ipsa contract
E) A stare decisis contract
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Adhesion
B) Exculpatory
C) Procedural
D) Substantive
E) Malfeasance
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Implied ratification
B) Express ratification
C) Express novation
D) Implied novation
E) Continued safety
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) 50
B) 47
C) 40
D) 35
E) 10
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) In all states Sally has the right to keep the dress and get a refund.
B) In all states Sally must return the dress; but she has a right to a full refund.
C) Regardless of what she does with the dress, Sally has no right to a refund in any state.
D) In some states Sally would have an obligation of restitution to the store.
E) In all states Sally would have an obligation of restitution to the store.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Implied ratification
B) Express ratification
C) Express novation
D) Implied novation
E) Express ratification if the statement is in writing but nothing if the statement is only oral
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Independent contracts
B) Substantive contracts
C) Adhesion contracts
D) Justifiable contracts
E) Severable contracts
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Substantive unconscionability
B) Unclear drafting
C) Procedural unconscionability
D) Outrageous wording
E) Adhesion conscionability
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs on the basis that although the contract was not unconscionable, public policy was violated.
B) The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs on the basis that the limitation of liability provision in the contract was unconscionable and violated the public policy of the state.
C) The court ruled in favor of the defendants on the basis that no contract of adhesion was involved and that, therefore, by definition the contract satisfied public policy.
D) The court ruled in favor of the defendants on the basis that the plaintiffs freely entered into the contract and should, therefore, be bound to its terms.
E) The court ruled in favor of the defendants on the basis that while the court would intervene in appropriate cases, a presumption against a finding of unconscionability exists in home inspection contracts; and the plaintiffs failed to rebut that presumption.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) 20%
B) 15%
C) 12%
D) 10%
E) It varies depending on the state involved.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) An agreement to commit a crime is enforceable and deemed legal so long as the substance of the agreement was deemed a crime after the agreement was entered into, but an agreement to commit a tort is unenforceable.
B) An agreement to commit a tort is enforceable, but an agreement to commit a crime is unenforceable.
C) An agreement to commit a crime is unenforceable, and an agreement to commit a tort is unenforceable unless a business tort is involved in which case the agreement is enforceable.
D) An agreement to commit a crime is unenforceable, and an agreement to commit a tort is unenforceable unless a privacy tort is involved in which case the agreement is enforceable.
E) An agreement to commit a crime is unenforceable, and an agreement to commit a tort is unenforceable.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 21 - 40 of 66
Related Exams