A) Negligent infliction of emotional distress.
B) Intentional infliction of strict-liability distress.
C) Intentional infliction of emotional distress.
D) Reckless invasion of solitude.
E) Psychological infliction of distress.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court allowed the lawsuit to proceed ruling that whether the plaintiff already had a bad reputation was irrelevant in relation to a defamation lawsuit.
B) The court allowed the lawsuit to proceed ruling that whether the plaintiff already had a bad reputation was irrelevant in relation to the lawsuit involved, an action for libel, although the plaintiff's reputation would likely have barred an action for slander.
C) The court allowed the lawsuit to proceed ruling that whether the plaintiff already had a bad reputation was irrelevant in relation to the lawsuit involved, an action for slander, although the plaintiff's reputation would likely have barred an action for libel.
D) The court dismissed the lawsuit recognizing that the facts fit within the jurisdiction's description of when the libel-proof doctrine might apply based upon the plaintiff's already bad reputation.
E) The court dismissed the lawsuit on the basis that the statements were not false but also recognized that the only proof justifying application of the libel-proof doctrine is proof that a defendant has been sentenced to death.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Tort litigation has been declining gradually since 1990.
B) Tort litigation has increased steadily since 1990.
C) Tort litigation has remained constant with no real change in numbers since 1990.
D) Tort litigation increased significantly in the 1990s but has declined in the last two years.
E) Tort litigation decreased in the 1990's but has increased steadily since the year 2000.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) When a person intentionally enters the land of another without permission; causes an object to be placed on the land of another without the landowner's permission; stays on the land of another when the owner tells him to depart; or refuses to remove something he placed on the property that the owner of the property asked him remove.
B) When a person intentionally causes an object to be placed on the land of another without the landowner's permission; refuses to remove something he placed on the property that the owner of the property asked him remove; or intentionally enters the land of another without permission; but not when a person stays on the land of another when the owner tells him to depart.
C) When a person intentionally enters the land of another without permission; causes an object to be placed on the land of another without the landowner's permission; or stays on the land of another when the owner tells him to depart; but not when a person refuses to remove something he placed on the property that the owner of the property asked him remove.
D) When a person intentionally enters the land of another without permission; or stays on the land of another when the owner tells him to depart; but not when a person causes an object to be placed on the land of another without the landowner's permission or when a person refuses to remove something he placed on the property that the owner of the property asked him remove.
E) A person does not commit trespass to realty unless it can be established that the person himself or herself initially entered the land of another without permission.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Tortfeasor
B) Guiltfeasor
C) Criminal
D) Runaway defendant
E) Nominal defendant
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Trespass to property.
B) Conversion.
C) Private nuisance.
D) Negligence.
E) Harassment.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Slander of quality
B) Trade libel
C) Libel of title
D) Slander of title
E) Libel of sale
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A civil or criminal action in state court.
B) A civil or criminal action in state court or federal court.
C) A breach of contract.
D) A wrong or injury to another, other than a breach of contract.
E) A wrong or injury to another, including a breach of contract.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Only that the statements were true.
B) Only that the statements were made in Parliament.
C) Only that the statements were made in court.
D) That the statements were made in Parliament or court.
E) That the statements were true, that the statements were made in Parliament, or that the statements were made in court.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) It is not always easy to predict what a court will do in any given case.
B) Punitive damages may not be awarded in excess of $3 million dollars.
C) A ratio of punitive damages to compensatory damages greater than 9 to 1 violates due process.
D) The Supreme Court ruled that the issue of punitive damages is for the jury and will not be disturbed on appeal regardless of the ratio of punitive damages to compensatory damages.
E) Awards of punitive damages in the U.S. are very similar to awards of punitive damages under the Canadian judicial system.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Ben has committed a battery.
B) Ben has committed both an assault and a battery.
C) Ben has not committed an assault or a battery because he acted in self-defense.
D) Ben cannot rely on self-defense because he was involved in the argument and not completely innocent.
E) Ben cannot rely upon self-defense because his life was not in danger.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Punitive damages
B) Compensatory damages
C) Nominal damages
D) Accrual damages
E) Perspective damages
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Robby's conduct constitutes a battery.
B) Robby's conduct constitutes an assault.
C) Robby's conduct constitutes both a battery and an assault.
D) Robby's conduct does not constitute an assault because there is no question of immediate bodily harm.
E) Robby's conduct does not constitute an assault because there was no physical contact.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Criminal
B) Liability
C) Intentional
D) Negligent
E) Strict-liability
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) By shoving her in the back, Bernard committed a battery.
B) By shoving her in the back, Bernard committed a battery and an assault.
C) By shoving her in the back, Bernard committed an assault.
D) Bernard did not commit any torts because he did not actually physically harm Millie.
E) Bernard did not commit any torts because he can rely on the self-defense theory.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 21 - 40 of 66
Related Exams