A) Judgment for plaintiff was affirmed because,although none of the writings mention plaintiff,oral testimony was admissible to supply an essential term of the agreement.
B) Plaintiff's claim was dismissed because the oral agreement was unenforceable because there was no writing.
C) Judgment for plaintiff was affirmed since no writing was required because the agreement did not come within the statute of frauds.
D) Plaintiff's claim was dismissed because none of the writings mention plaintiff or identify plaintiff as a party to the contract,and oral testimony was necessary to supply an essential term of the agreement,and thus they are insufficient to satisfy the statute of frauds.
E) Judgment for plaintiff was affirmed because the writings along with oral testimony were sufficient to satisfy the status of frauds.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Interests in land within the statute of frauds include promises to sell crops annually and agreements between parties for profit sharing from the sale of real property,but not boundary disputes that have been settled through the use of land.
B) Interests in land within the statute of frauds does not include promises to sell crops annually,agreements between parties for profit sharing from the sale of real property,and boundary disputes that have been settled through the use of land.
C) Interests in land within the statute of frauds include boundary disputes that have been settled through the use of land,but not promises to sell crops annually or agreements between parties for profit sharing from the sale of real property.
D) Interests in land within the statute of frauds include boundary disputes that have been settled through the use of land and promises to sell crops annually,but not agreements between parties for profit sharing from the sale of real property.
E) Interests in land within the statute of frauds include promises to sell crops annually,but not agreements between parties for profit sharing from the sale of real property or boundary disputes that have been settled through the use of land.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) France has a limited parol evidence rule.
B) German law does not have a parol evidence rule.
C) England has significantly increased the number of contracts falling within the statute of frauds since the original act was passed.
D) England requires that promises to pay for the debt of others be in writing.
E) The parol evidence rule in France does not apply to commercial contracts.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Contracts involving the provision of any goods
B) Contracts involving the provision of services
C) Contracts involving any debt
D) Contracts whose terms prevent possible performance within one year
E) Contracts involving services in relation to computer equipment
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) 1770
B) 1776
C) 1865
D) 1677
E) 1555
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes,but only if there is another writing with the $20 price per tuner.
B) Yes,because the written agreement was conditioned on the $20 per tuner oral agreement.
C) No,because the parol evidence rule prevents parties from introducing oral evidence when there is a written contract.
D) No,because he failed to include price in the writing.
E) No,because no exception applies to the parol evidence rule.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Consumer
B) Customized
C) Retailed
D) Wholesale
E) Collateral
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Sale of a house,where the buyer has put down a 5% deposit.
B) Sale of a house,where the buyer has planted several trees before winter.
C) Sale of a farm but not the entire property.
D) Sale of a farm,where the buyer has paid for a new roof.
E) Sale of a house,where the seller gave keys to the buyer and the buyer has moved several large pieces of furniture into the garage.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The purpose of the rule is to prevent evidence that substantially contradicts an agreement in its written form.
B) The rule is a rule of evidence.
C) The rule is an amalgamation of different rules and conditions.
D) The rule is not a unitary concept or rule.
E) The rule relates to substantive legal issues.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Jonie promises that his house will also be Kiel's house when they get married.
B) Kiel promises to marry Jonie and take Jonie on a honeymoon to Paris.
C) Jonie promises to buy Kiel a big ring if they get married.
D) Jonie promises he will marry Kiel in two years and pay for a big wedding.
E) Jonie and Kiel promise to marry each other.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) It is not a unitary government act.
B) It does not exist at the federal level.
C) It relates to fraudulent contracts.
D) It does not address illegal contracts.
E) It requires that only certain contracts be in writing.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Evidence of prior dealings between the parties.
B) Evidence of usage of trade.
C) Contracts based on terms that were agreed orally.
D) Ambiguous evidence.
E) Contracts that have been subsequently modified.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Lottie,Byron's father,and Marcus' father.
B) Natasha's father,Byron,and Marcus' father.
C) Marta,Byron,and Marcus.
D) Lottie,Jeb,and Marcus' father.
E) Natasha,Jeb,and Lucia.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 80 of 90
Related Exams