A) He would be correct because of the special UCC exception for sports-related items.
B) He would be incorrect because Eduardo did not confirm orally or in writing that the trophies were acceptable.
C) He would be incorrect because Eduardo did not confirm in writing that the trophies were acceptable.
D) He would be correct because Eduardo's payment by check for the goods upon their delivery provided Troy with a measure of reliance that they would be acceptable.
E) He would be correct because of the special UCC exception for school-related items.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No,although a buyer has a right to cancel a contract,Zelda must provide the seller a chance to cure.
B) No,even though the goods are nonconforming,Zelda may not cancel the contract.
C) Yes,a buyer has the right to cancel the contract.
D) No,a buyer has no right to cancel a contract without giving the seller a chance to cure.
E) Yes,when goods are nonconforming,a buyer may reject goods and cancel the contract if a condition such as time being of the essence is present.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Reduced by 5%
B) Reduced in any manner
C) Violated the perfect tender rule
D) Substantially impaired
E) Reduced by 10%
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Course of dealing references previous commercial dealings within the particular industry,while course of performance refers to the history of dealings between the parties in the particular contract at issue.
B) Course of performance references previous commercial transactions between the parties,while course of dealing refers to the history of dealings between the parties in the particular contract at issue.
C) Course of dealing references previous commercial transactions between the parties,while course of performance refers to the history of dealings between the parties in the particular contract at issue.
D) Course of dealing and course of performance are treated the same with regard to conforming and nonconforming goods.
E) Course of dealing is an exception to the perfect tender rule,while course of performance is not an exception to the perfect tender rule.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Cure
B) Deduct
C) Renounce
D) Defend
E) Reject
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Usage of trade
B) Trade norm
C) Course of performance
D) Course of dealing
E) Anticipated trade dealing
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Offer of notification
B) Offer of delivery
C) Tender of delivery
D) Offer of availability
E) Tender of offer
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Margot must provide prompt notice of her intent to cure.
B) Margot can presume Halden's accepted the goods.
C) Margot must follow up to ensure inspection is complete.
D) Margot has the obligation to demand if the contract is accepted.
E) Margot must confirm the goods were received.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing
B) honesty in law
C) honesty in equity
D) honesty in equity and also reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing
E) honesty in equity and honesty in law
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Eduardo did not waive the performance provisions of the contract regarding the time for delivery only because he canceled the check before it was cashed by Troy.
B) Eduardo did not waive the performance provisions of the contract regarding the time for delivery because he paid by check.
C) Eduardo cannot rely upon the performance provisions of the contract regarding the time for delivery because he did not object within 24 hours of the delivery of the trophies and,therefore,did not meet the UCC 24-hour rule.
D) Eduardo's payment for the trophies without inspection and after the time called for by the contract likely waived the performance provisions of the contract regarding the time for delivery.
E) Eduardo has the right to rely on the failure of Troy to deliver the trophies in a timely manner and will likely prevail.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes,if they are still sellable,he must perform under the terms of the contract.
B) Yes,unless the contract specifically states otherwise.
C) No,since the goods are partially destroyed,Lui may treat the contract as void.
D) No,but he must provide Lui with time to cure.
E) No,since the goods are partially destroyed,Kai may treat the contract as void.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The right to perform
B) The right to review
C) The right to claim
D) The right to cure
E) The right to reclaim
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Within 7 days after
B) Within 48 hours after
C) Immediately after
D) Before
E) Within 24 hours after
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No.
B) Yes,but Zelda's only other option is to accept the nonconforming berries and adjust the contract accordingly.
C) Yes,but Zelda's only other option is to reject the nonconforming berries subject to cure.
D) Yes,Zelda may reject the nonconforming berries subject to cure,or accept the nonconforming berries and adjust the contract accordingly.
E) Yes,but the course of dealing makes other options void.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes,but only if he can provide correctly worded T-shirts by the next day,the last day set for performance.
B) Yes,Tyler has up to 20 days under the UCC to fix any problem.
C) No,while the UCC provides a party with the right to fix some problems,the problems with the T-shirts were too serious to afford Tyler that right.
D) Yes,Tyler has up to 10 days under the UCC to fix any problem.
E) No,the UCC does not provide a party with the right to fix any problem.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court ruled in favor of the dealership because ads can never constitute offers.
B) The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff on the basis of unilateral mistake and unconscionability.
C) The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff because the ad constituted an enforceable offer.
D) The court ruled in favor of the dealership on a combination of mistake and unconscionability.
E) The court ruled in favor of the dealership because an intentional misrepresentation is needed before an ad can be considered an offer,and there was no proof of an intentional misrepresentation on the part of the dealership.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 21 - 40 of 90
Related Exams