A) Night Club would not be liable because Trevor's acts were not criminal or tortious.
B) Night Club would not be liable because Trevor was not acting within the scope of his employment.
C) Night Club would not be liable because Zack started the fight.
D) Night Club would be liable because Trevor was negligent when he hit Pat with the chair.
E) Night Club would be liable because it should have anticipated an injury similar to Pat's based on the type of business it conducts.
G) B) and E)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) Uncovered
B) Revealed
C) Acknowledged
D) Permitted
E) Disclosed
G) B) and D)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) That based on extrinsic evidence showing the decedent's intent,the power of attorney included the power to transfer the property.
B) That because no extrinsic evidence existed to clarify the meaning of the power of attorney,the transfer was valid.
C) That because no extrinsic evidence existed to clarify the meaning of the power of attorney,the transfer was invalid.
D) That based on extrinsic evidence showing the decedent's intent,the power of attorney did not include the power to transfer the property.
E) That because the power of attorney did not specifically give the wife the power to transfer property into the trust,the transfer was invalid.
G) B) and D)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) Res superior
B) Supre superior
C) Employment Superior
D) Respondeat superior
E) Stare decisis
G) A) and C)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) The window washer was entitled to a recovery in tort based on the inherently dangerous activity at issue and the defendant's failure to take sufficient precautions.
B) The window washer was not entitled to recover because he took insufficient precautions for his own safety.
C) The window washer was entitled to no recovery based on his status as an independent contractor.
D) The window washer was entitled to workers' compensation as an employee.
E) The window washer was entitled to recovery for breach of contract.
G) B) and C)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) It is unlikely that Jun will be held liable for Tomás's injuries because Connor had substantially departed from the course of his employer's business.
B) It is unlikely that Jun will be held liable for Tomás's injuries unless it can be proven that Connor had no insurance and lacks the ability to pay.
C) Jun will likely be held liable for Tomás's injuries because while Connor was acting outside the scope of his duties at the time of the accident,he had not substantially departed from the course of his employer's business.
D) Jun will likely be held liable for Tomás's injuries because Jun allowed Connor to take the truck home regardless of Jun's instructions regarding the use of the truck.
E) Jun will likely be held liable for Tomás's injuries because Connor was driving Jun's truck at the time of the accident.
G) C) and D)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) Identified principal
B) Partially disclosed principal
C) Undisclosed principal
D) Disclosed principal
E) Partially identified principal
G) B) and E)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) Jun is liable to Beth under the theory of negligence.
B) Jun is liable to Beth under the theory of misrepresentation.
C) Jun has liability to Beth under the theory of misrepresentation but only if Hae is insolvent.
D) Jun is liable to Beth for only 50% of any damages she can prove.
E) Jun has no liability to Beth.
G) A) and C)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) The law would not hold the agent liable on the agreement.
B) The law will likely hold the agent liable for the agreement.
C) The law will hold the agent liable for the agreement unless the contract the agent had with the principal impliedly or expressly provided that the agent would not be held liable in such cases.
D) The law will hold the agent liable for the agreement unless a contract for under $1,000 is involved in which case only the principal would be held liable.
E) The law will hold the agent liable for the agreement unless the contract the agent had with the principal expressly provided that the agent would not be held liable in such cases.
G) B) and D)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A special power of attorney grants the a...View Answer
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) The principal does not control the details of the independent contractor's performance.
B) An independent contractor is not an employee of the principal.
C) If an independent contractor commits a crime without the authorization of the principal,the principal is not liable for the agent's crime.
D) A principal is not liable for extremely dangerous actions engaged in by the independent contractor.
E) An individual who hires an independent contractor cannot be held liable for the independent contractor's tortious actions under the doctrine of respondeat superior.
G) All of the above
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) Singapore passed a law providing that a principal must countersign any electronic transaction engaged in by an agent.
B) Singapore passed a law by which lack of awareness of a principal for an agent's acts is not recognized as a defense.
C) Singapore passed a law providing that each employer must post a list electronically of all its agents with authority to act on its behalf.
D) In Singapore because of the fear of fraud,agents are not allowed to engage in electronic transactions on behalf of principals.
E) Singapore relies on a type of law similar to U.S.common law in addressing agency authority in regard to electronic transactions.
G) A) and D)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) The defendant was not held liable because the former employee's act exceeded the scope of his employment.
B) The defendant was held vicariously liable for the acts of its former employee because it did not notify customers that the agent had been terminated.
C) The defendant was not held liable because the plaintiff should have known the employee was no longer employed by the defendant.
D) The defendant was held strictly liable because the nature of the acts involved were inherently dangerous.
E) The defendant was not held liable because it had no reason to know a former employee was stealing from its clients.
G) A) and D)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) Rob's offer was authorized.
B) If Rob would have contacted Wendy and told her that he was going to make an offer on a home that did not meet all of her requirements.
C) If Rob would have contacted Wendy and received her approvable to extend an offer on a home that did not meet all of her requirements.
D) If Rob would have informed the seller of Wendy's name and contact information.
E) If Rob would have informed the seller the home did not meet all of the principal's requirements.
G) B) and D)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) The employer can recover all amounts paid from a negligent employee but only if it can be shown that the employee's negligence was based upon the violation of a statute.
B) The employer has no right to receive any reimbursement from the negligent employee.
C) The employer has a right to recover only 50% of any amounts paid from a negligent employee.
D) The employer has a right to recover all amounts paid from the negligent employee.
E) The employer can recover 50% of any amounts paid from a negligent employee but only if it can be shown that the employee's negligence was based upon the violation of a statute.
G) C) and E)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) The employer should have better hiring practices.
B) The employer typically has more money to pay for the harm.
C) The employer benefits from the work of the employee,therefore,the employer should also be responsible for any harm the employee caused.
D) The employer did know or should have known his or her employee would cause harm.
E) Under the time and place theory,the employee would not have caused harm at that exact time and place had it not been for the employer.
G) None of the above
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) It is a French phrase meaning "let the agency stand."
B) It is a Latin phrase meaning "release the agent."
C) It is a French phrase meaning "agency liability."
D) It is a Latin phrase meaning "let the superior speak."
E) It is a German phrase meaning "liability without fault."
G) A) and B)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 80 of 90
Related Exams