Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That in awarding the bonus,the majority shareholder violated the duty of care she owed to the company.
B) That the majority shareholder was guilty of no violation in awarding the bonus.
C) That in awarding the bonus,the majority shareholder violated the duty of loyalty she owed to the company.
D) That the majority shareholder's vote to award the bonus would be upheld only if she submitted additional proof that the bonus was deserved.
E) That in awarding the bonus,the majority shareholder violated the business judgment rule.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Share allowances
B) Stock warrants
C) Preemptive shares
D) Allocated shares
E) Share grants
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Director.
B) Outside director.
C) Affiliated director.
D) Officer.
E) Shareholder.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) He cannot be held responsible if the board of directors approved the release of the drug.
B) He can be held personally responsible for his crimes.
C) He can be held personally responsible only if the company was not a C-corporation.
D) He cannot be held responsible for his actions because the corporation released the drug.
E) He cannot be held responsible unless he was at least the executive vice president.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the business judgment rule applied to shield the directors from liability because the directors received no money directly from the golf course.
B) That while the business judgment rule applies to directors,it did not apply to provide protection to the directors because they stood to benefit personally.
C) That the directors could not benefit from the rule because the business judgment rule applies to officers,not directors.
D) That the business judgment rule applied to shield the directors from liability because the transaction was properly recorded on the company's books and not hidden.
E) That the business judgment rule applied to shield the directors from liability because no fraud was involved in the transaction.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The rule of corporate integrity.
B) The superior judgment rule.
C) The research and investigation rule.
D) The business judgment rule.
E) There is no defense.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) One year
B) Sixteen months
C) Eleven months
D) Two years
E) Nine months
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) She is liable for double the stated corporate value of the stock in addition to any price she already paid.
B) She is liable for the stated corporate value of the stock in addition to any price she already paid.
C) She is liable for paying the difference between the price she paid for the shares and the stated corporate value of the shares.
D) She is liable for paying the difference between the price she paid for the shares and the stated corporate value of the shares plus a $10,000 penalty.
E) If the board wanted to offer it to her,they had that right,and there is no consequence to Simone.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Watered stock
B) Less-value stock
C) No-par stock
D) Unapproved stock
E) Reduced stock
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Shareholder derivative suit
B) Shareholder's direct suit
C) Active allocation suit
D) Shareholder action suit
E) Investigative action
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Shareholder.
B) Outside director.
C) Affiliated director.
D) Director.
E) Officer.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) According to the amount of profit projected by incorporators for the first year.
B) According to the corporate articles or bylaws.
C) By vote of the stockholders.
D) In the discretion of the president of the corporation.
E) According to the number of shares issued.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No,she is incorrect because she owes a duty of care to shareholders although she owes no other duties.
B) No,she is incorrect because she owes a duty of loyalty to shareholders although she owes no other duties.
C) Yes,she is correct because it is the directors who owe duties to shareholders.
D) She is partially correct.She owes both a duty of care and a duty of loyalty to minority shareholders,but no duties to majority shareholders because the law assumes that they have the power to protect their own interests.
E) No,she is incorrect because she owes both a duty of care and a duty of loyalty to shareholders.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court ruled that the business judgment rule shielded the lawsuit insofar as foreign wrongdoing was alleged,but not for wrongdoing committed in the U.S.
B) The court ruled that the business judgment rule exempted the directors from liability unless the shareholder could establish that the shareholders lost money on account of their actions.
C) The court ruled that the business judgment rule exempted the directors from liability only so long as the directors could establish that the shareholders did not lose money on account of their actions.
D) The court ruled that the business judgment rule did not apply because illegality was involved and that the corporation was,therefore,liable.
E) The court ruled that the business judgment rule exempted the directors from liability.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 80 of 90
Related Exams