A) Bailment
B) Transfer
C) Loan
D) Release
E) Lease
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Inter vivos gifts
B) Sustainable gifts
C) In rem gifts
D) Probable gifts
E) Causa mortis gifts
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) There is a difference between physical possession and a mental intention to possess.
B) For immovable property, the potential owner must possess the property for no less than 20 years before full ownership can occur.
C) For movable property, the potential owner must possess the property for no less than 10 years before full ownership can occur.
D) Immovable property includes anything attached to the ground, such as trees, buildings, homes, and arenas.
E) Registration is not required for any movable property.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Real
B) Personal
C) Valued
D) Appraised
E) Substantive
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) The court ruled that a prisoner has no rights in respect to a guard.
B) The court ruled that while a prisoner has some rights, a prisoner does not have the right to expect a guard to safeguard belongings.
C) The court ruled that although no bailment existed, the guard had a duty to lock the cell.
D) The court ruled that a bailment existed and that the guard had a duty to lock the cell and to act with reasonable care as a bailee.
E) The court ruled that the guard had no duty to lock the cell because no witnesses confirmed that the plaintiff prisoner informed the guard that his personal belongings were in the cell.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) That a jury question was presented as to whether the negligence of the hotel prevented it from relying on the protection of the Innkeeper Act.
B) That as a matter of law, the plaintiff was entitled to prevail because the negligence of the hotel prevented it from relying on the protection of the Innkeeper Act.
C) That as a matter of law, the plaintiff was entitled to prevail because the Innkeeper Act applies to shield a hotel only from acts of its employees with pass keys, not acts of a non-employee thief.
D) That the Innkeeper Act shielded the hotel from liability because the items could have been deposited in the hotel safe and that the plaintiff was not therefore entitled to recover.
E) That the plaintiff was entitled to recover only ½ of his losses due to the application of the Innkeeper Act and the fact that the items could have been deposited in the hotel safe.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the car wash was liable to the plaintiff because the car wash accepted responsibility as a bailee.
B) That the car wash was not liable to the plaintiff because the car wash employees had no notice they were taking responsibility for so much jewelry.
C) That the car wash and the plaintiff would be required to split the loss.
D) That the car wash was liable to the plaintiff for the loss because the car wash had not issued a valid disclaimer.
E) That it would be unconscionable to hold the car wash liable for the loss.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Tangible
B) Manifest
C) Substantive
D) Discernible
E) Physical
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A bailment may be gratuitous.
B) A bailment may be for consideration.
C) A bailment agreement must be contained in a written agreement.
D) The parties to a bailment contract can limit or expand the liability of the bailee by contract.
E) The standard of care varies depending on who benefits from the bailment.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Real
B) Personal
C) Valued
D) Appraised
E) Substantive
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Only the duty of compensation and reimbursement.
B) The duty of compensation and reimbursement, and the duty to warn the bailee of known defects or any that could have been discovered through reasonable investigation.
C) Only the duty to provide the bailee with property free from hidden defects that could harm the bailee.
D) Only the duty of compensation.
E) The duty of compensation and reimbursement, the duty to provide the bailee with property free from hidden defects that could harm the bailee, and the duty to keep accurate records of the transaction.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Lost
B) Mislaid
C) Discarded
D) Abandoned
E) Terminated
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) At that point he made a valid gift that could not be revoked.
B) He did not make a valid inter vivos or causa mortis gift because there was no certainty that he would die.
C) He made an irrevocable gift at that time only if Bubbles never had another boyfriend; otherwise, she had to give the ticket and any resulting cash to Frank.
D) He made an irrevocable gift at that time if Bubbles refrained from having another boyfriend until she cashed the ticket; and, after the ticket was converted, the condition no longer applied.
E) None of these.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The carrier is liable only if ordinary or gross negligence can be proven.
B) The carrier is liable only if gross negligence can be proven.
C) The carrier is liable only if it can be proven that the carrier acted in a reckless manner.
D) The carrier is generally strictly liable for harm to the bailed property.
E) Because of the doctrine of assumption of risk, the carrier is not liable for harm to the bailed property.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the defendant was entitled to keep the ring because the termination of the engagement was the plaintiff's fault.
B) That the defendant was entitled to keep the ring because it was a completed gift when she initially received it.
C) That a jury question was presented as to whether the plaintiff made an absolute gift of the ring to the defendant after the termination of the engagement.
D) The under principles of equity, the plaintiff was entitled to keep the ring, but only if she paid the defendant ½ of its value and that, otherwise, it would be sold with the proceeds split between the parties.
E) That because the termination of the engagement was the defendant's fault, she was required to return the ring.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 21 - 40 of 65
Related Exams