Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Race and color
B) Race, color, and religion
C) Race, color, religion, and sex
D) Race, color, religion, sex, and national origin
E) Race, color, religion, sex, national origin, and age
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The operation of a bona fide seniority system
B) That decisions are based on reasonable factors other than age
C) The bona fide occupational qualification defense
D) The qualified but aged defense
E) The executive exemption
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Up to three years of back pay
B) Attorney fees
C) Remedial seniority
D) Court costs
E) Reinstatement
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the defendant was entitled to a judgment in its favor because a claim under the Equal Pay Act cannot be based on a male successor's pay rate.
B) That the defendant was entitled to a judgment in its favor because Title VII subsumed the provisions of the Equal Pay Act, and the plaintiff was required to name Title VII in her complaint.
C) That the defendant was entitled to a judgment in its favor because it established that the plaintiff was fired for cause.
D) That the plaintiff correctly made out her prima facie case by alleging the wage differential between her pay at termination and her successor's pay at the onset of his new position.
E) That the plaintiff correctly made out her prima facie case through establishing that there was no basis upon which her termination could be legally based and that the male successor was hired almost immediately following her termination.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the plaintiff had not established the elements of a prima facie case of age discrimination because he had failed to produce evidence that the employer replaced him with a younger person.
B) That the plaintiff established the elements of a prima facie case of age discrimination and that there was no requirement that he establish that he was replaced with a younger person, but that the plaintiff failed to rebut the defendant's proffered reason for the discharge.
C) That the plaintiff established the elements of a prima facie case of age discrimination, that there was no requirement that he establish that he was replaced with a younger person, and that a jury question existed as to whether the plaintiff could sufficiently rebut the defendant's proffered reason for the discharge.
D) That a jury question existed both as to whether the plaintiff established the elements of a prima facie case of age discrimination and as to whether the plaintiff could sufficiently rebut the defendant's proffered reason for the discharge.
E) That the plaintiff was entitled to a verdict in his favor as a matter of law because he established a prima facie case and also successfully rebutted the defendant's proffered reason for the discharge.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The Americans with Disabilities Act
B) The Disabled Citizens Act
C) The Handicapped Americans Act
D) The Disabled Americans Act
E) The Civil Rights Act-Title VII
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Indian tribes
B) Private clubs
C) Unions
D) Employment agencies
E) Private employers with 10 or less employees
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) When payment is made pursuant to a seniority system.
B) When payment is made pursuant to a merit system.
C) When payment is made pursuant to a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of production.
D) When the differential is based on any factor other than sex.
E) When the parties sign a waiver.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The plaintiff wins.
B) The burden shifts to the defendant to articulate a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the discharge.
C) The burden shifts to the defendant to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that discrimination did not occur.
D) The burden remains with the plaintiff to prove discrimination beyond a reasonable doubt, a special standard in disparate-treatment cases.
E) The burden remains with the plaintiff to establish damages to a reasonable certainty.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) To eliminate situations in which women, working alongside men or replacing men, would be paid lower wages for doing substantially the same job.
B) To eliminate situations in which women and also men were not paid equally for doing substantially the same job.
C) To eliminate situations in which women and men were being paid less that deserved for certain types of work.
D) To eliminate situations in which both men and women were denied overtime compensation and fair working conditions.
E) To eliminate situations in which men, women, and those of a different national origin were denied overtime compensation and fair working conditions.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) A provable case
B) At first view
C) Probable cause
D) Beyond a reasonable doubt
E) By a preponderance
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Since he is covered under the act with an actual physical disability, she must grant his request regardless of cost.
B) She is not required to accommodate him under the act until his doctor certifies that he has reached maximum medical improvement and will not get any better.
C) She will likely be required to put in the second elevator because under the act, an employee is not supposed to be asked for any accommodation by the employer.
D) She will likely not be required to put in the second elevator because George can move his office, and putting in a second elevator would probably be an undue hardship on the employer.
E) She will likely not have to put in a second elevator because it will not benefit other employees, and an employer only has to make a change to a building as an accommodation under the act if the change will benefit a substantial number of employees.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) They will be able to do so.
B) Trevor and George will be able to go straight to court; but plaintiffs alleging coverage based on a mental disability, such as Samantha, must first file a charge with the EEOC or an appropriate state agency.
C) Samantha will be able to go straight to court, but Trevor and George will have to first file a charge with the EEOC or an appropriate state agency because only plaintiffs alleging coverage under the act based on a mental disability may go straight to court.
D) Only George must first file a charge with the EEOC or an appropriate state agency because his claim is the only claim that would involve a substantial amount of money.
E) Samantha, Trevor, and George must all first file a charge with the EEOC or with an appropriate state agency, and they should not be allowed to proceed in federal court without doing so.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Title VII
B) Title VI
C) Title V
D) Title IV
E) Title III
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) An employer cannot be held liable in such cases because the employer has no control over the nonemployee.
B) An employer is liable as a matter of law in such cases because an employer has an absolute duty to provide a work environment that is free of harassment.
C) An employer may be held liable in such cases if the employer knows that a customer repeatedly harasses an employee, yet the employer does nothing to remedy the situation.
D) An employer may only be held liable in such cases if quid pro quo harassment is involved.
E) An employer may only be held liable in such cases if disparate-impact harassment is involved.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) 1920
B) 1932
C) 1944
D) 1959
E) 1964
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 21 - 40 of 65
Related Exams