A) Delegatee
B) Delegator
C) Assignor
D) Assignee
E) Transferor
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Sally will win because Paul's attempted assignment would increase the duties to which she agreed.
B) Sally will win because all assignments are invalid without the obligor's consent.
C) Sally will win unless Paul paid her the $300 in advance in which case Paul will win.
D) Paul will win because he may validly assign the contract without Sally's consent.
E) Paul will win so long as he tells Sally about the assignment prior to the time she begins any performance whatsoever.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Promisee
B) Promisor
C) Obligor
D) Initial contracting parties
E) Assignee
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Intended
B) Incidental
C) Preferred
D) Collateral
E) Ancillary
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Delegatee
B) Delegator
C) Assignor
D) Assignee
E) Transferor
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The umpire won as a matter of law because he was an intended third-party beneficiary to the contract between the defending school board and the athletic association, and the defendant had an absolute nondelegable duty to provide protection ensuring that no one was hurt.
B) The umpire won as a matter of law because although he was not an intended third-party beneficiary to the contract between the defending school board and the athletic association, the defendant had an absolute nondelegable duty to provide protection ensuring that no one was hurt.
C) The defending school board won as a matter of law because although the umpire was an intended third-party beneficiary to the contract, only the athletic association could proceed with a lawsuit.
D) The defending school board won as a matter of law because the umpire was not an intended third-party beneficiary to the contract.
E) The case was remanded for trial on the issue of whether adequate police protection was provided in view of the fact that the plaintiff was an intended third-party beneficiary to the contract between the school board and the athletic association.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Intended and donee
B) Creditor and incidental
C) Intended and creditor
D) Donee and incidental
E) Creditor and donee
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Sally will win as to both because they are equally liable to provide the funds.
B) Sally will win as to Bob but win as to Trudy only if she can prove that Bob is insolvent and unable to pay.
C) Sally will win as to Bob but win as to Trudy only if she can prove that she cannot find Bob in order to serve process on him.
D) Sally will lose as to both Trudy and Bob because promises to give gifts are unenforceable in the absence of reliance.
E) Sally will lose as to Trudy because Trudy had no obligation to go through with the gift, but she will win as to Bob.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) A creditor beneficiary must accept assignment of rights, but there is no requirement that a donee beneficiary do so.
B) A donee beneficiary must accept assignment of rights, but there is no requirement that a creditor beneficiary do so.
C) An assignee must agree to accept assigned rights, and there is a strict protocol for doing so.
D) An assignee may decline an assignment if he has not agreed to it and declines in a timely fashion after learning of it.
E) An assignee may only decline an assignment if a delegation of duties is also involved.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Obligor
B) Obligee
C) Assignor
D) Assignee
E) Boundee
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The first-assignment-in-time rule
B) The last-assignment-in-time rule
C) The English rule
D) The French rule
E) The American rule
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Third-party beneficiary
B) Second-party beneficiary
C) First-party beneficiary
D) Assignment
E) Creditor Beneficiary
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Fred will win only if Fred did a good job on the portraits.
B) Fred will lose because Michelle's only obligation is to pay Belinda.
C) Fred will win unless Michelle can prove that Fred knew that she did not want him to do the portraits.
D) Fred will lose unless Fred can prove that he was unaware that Michelle did not want him to do the portraits.
E) Michelle will win because the portrait was personal in nature and could not be assigned.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) When the only part of a contract left to be fulfilled is the payment.
B) When nothing has been done on the contract at all.
C) When no more than half the contractual duties have been performed.
D) When no more than three-fourths of the contractual duties have been performed.
E) There is no exception because rights to a contract that is personal in nature may generally be assigned.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) The court ruled that FCC did not violate a nonassignability clause and that it was entitled to recover.
B) The court ruled that even though FCC violated the nonassignability clause, the nonassignability clause was against public policy; and FCC was allowed to recover.
C) The court ruled that even though FCC violated the nonassignability clause, the other party also violated a nonassignability clause resulting in FCC being able to recover its full claim.
D) The court ruled that FCC violated a nonassignability clause and was therefore unable to recover on its claim.
E) The court ruled that FCC violated a nonassignability clause but that because the other party also violated a nonassignability clause, FCC's recovery would be reduced by 50%, not completely barred.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 21 - 40 of 68
Related Exams