Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) She is correct. The neighbor will be required to pay Jackson under a theory of quasi-contract.
B) She is correct. The neighbor will be required to pay Jackson based upon an implied-in-fact contract.
C) She is correct. The neighbor will be required to pay Jackson based upon an implied-in-law contract.
D) She is correct. The neighbor will be required to pay Jackson based upon an express contract.
E) She is incorrect. The neighbor will not be required to pay Jackson.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court ruled for the plaintiffs for the following two reasons: (1) there was no contract because plaintiffs did not assent to it, and (2) even if a contract existed, the contract was illusory and unenforceable because Zappos could avoid promises at any time.
B) The court ruled for the plaintiffs only because of its finding that no contract existed based on the plaintiffs lack of assent.
C) The court ruled for the plaintiffs only because of its finding that the contract was illusory and unenforceable because Zappos could avoid promises at any time.
D) The court ruled in favor of Zappos on the basis that even though some provisions of the contract were unenforceable, because of the federal policy favoring arbitration agreements, the arbitration clause itself was enforceable.
E) The court ruled in favor of Zappos on the basis that the contract was properly entered into and was fully enforceable.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Trilateral
B) Bilateral
C) Unilateral
D) Complete
E) Anticipatory
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The Interpretation Rule
B) The Simple Rule
C) The Understandable Rule
D) The Plain Meaning Rule
E) The Comprehensive Rule
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Five
B) Eight
C) Ten
D) Twenty
E) Thirty
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) She is correct because contract law is based upon a subjective theory of contracts.
B) She is correct because her genuinely held belief establishes that she did not commit fraud.
C) She is correct because agreements for the sale of goods are based on a subjective theory.
D) She is incorrect because her subjective belief would not be the basis for a determination of whether the contract would be enforced in this case and also because fraud is not necessary in order to find a breach of contract.
E) She is correct but only if Rick subjectively believed the same as she did.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Executory
B) Executed
C) Anticipatory
D) Ended
E) Stopped
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Contract
B) Offer
C) Consideration
D) Acceptance
E) Legal object
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Legal object
B) Agreement
C) Coherence
D) Alliance
E) Concurrence
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Offeree
B) Offeror
C) Agreeor
D) Agree
E) Inquirer
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Comprehensive
B) Statutory
C) Common
D) Restated
E) Modified
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Being cordial in the negotiation of contracts.
B) Refraining from unethical behavior in the negotiation of contracts.
C) Being cordial and refraining from unethical behavior in the negotiation of contracts.
D) The bargained-for exchange.
E) A contract negotiated in person as opposed to by telephone or e-mail.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Unilateral
B) Trilateral
C) Complete
D) Bilateral
E) Classified
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The agreement lacked a proper offer.
B) The contract lacked a proper acceptance.
C) The contract lacked consideration.
D) The contract lacked a writing.
E) The contract lacked both an appropriate offer and an appropriate acceptance.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Voidable
B) Executory
C) Implied
D) Executed
E) Void
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 41 - 60 of 71
Related Exams