Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

Which of the following torts seek to compensate people wrongfully subjected to litigation?


A) Malicious prosecution, wrongful civil proceedings, and abuse of process.
B) Wrongful civil proceedings but not malicious prosecution or abuse of process.
C) Abuse of process but not malicious prosecution or wrongful civil proceedings.
D) Malicious prosecution and wrongful civil proceedings, but not abuse of process.
E) Malicious prosecution and abuse of process but not wrongful civil proceedings.

F) B) and D)
G) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is true regarding the intent needed for an intentional tort?


A) The intent at issue is not intent to harm but, rather, is intent to engage in a specific act, which ultimately results in an injury, physical or economic, to another.
B) The intent at issue is not intent to harm but, rather, is intent to engage in a specific act, which ultimately results in a physical injury to another. Economic injury is insufficient.
C) The intent at issue is intent to harm that results in an injury, physical or economic, to another.
D) The intent at issue is intent to harm that results in physical injury to another. Economic injury is insufficient.
E) The intent at issue is not intent to harm and is not intent to engage in a specific act. Instead, negligence will suffice.

F) B) and C)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What did the court rule in regard to the plaintiff's claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress in Olson v. CenturyLink, the case in the text in which the plaintiff alleged that representatives of the defendant, a provider of telephone services, wrongly failed to process his application, disconnected his telephone service, and hung up on him during telephone conversations?


A) That the conduct complained of by the plaintiff failed to meet the level of conduct required for a finding of the intentional infliction of emotional distress.
B) That the plaintiff's complaint regarding the disconnection of his telephone service was sufficient to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress but that the plaintiff's other allegations were insufficient to support an award based on the tort of the intentional infliction of emotional distress.
C) That the plaintiff's complaint regarding the refusal to process his application was sufficient to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress but that the plaintiff's other allegations were insufficient to support an award based on the tort of the intentional infliction of emotional distress.
D) That the plaintiff's complaint regarding representatives hanging up on him were sufficient to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress but that the plaintiff's other allegations were insufficient to support an award based on the tort of the intentional infliction of emotional distress.
E) That the plaintiff would be allowed to proceed as to all allegations because they were all adequate to support a verdict based on the intentional infliction of emotional distress.

F) D) and E)
G) C) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

_____ torts occur when the defendant is careless and acts in a way that subjects other people to an unreasonable risk of harm.


A) Criminal
B) Liability
C) Intentional
D) Negligent
E) Strict-liability

F) D) and E)
G) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Robby calls Bobby on the telephone and threatened to come over and break his nose. Which of the following is true?


A) Robby's conduct constitutes a battery.
B) Robby's conduct constitutes an assault.
C) Robby's conduct constitutes both a battery and an assault.
D) Robby's conduct does not constitute an assault because there is no question of immediate bodily harm.
E) Robby's conduct does not constitute an assault because there was no physical contact.

F) B) and E)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is true regarding the apprehension necessary for the tort of assault?


A) Apprehension and fear are the same thing.
B) A person may be in apprehension of physical harm, even if the same person is too courageous to be afraid of that physical harm.
C) Actual injury is necessary for valid apprehension to be proven.
D) The test for assault involves subjective apprehension, not reasonable apprehension.
E) There is no requirement that the apprehension be of immediate physical contact.

F) A) and B)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is true regarding the groups generally considered to be public figures for purposes of the public figure privilege to actions for defamation?


A) Politicians, but not entertainers, are generally considered to be public figures.
B) Entertainers, but not politicians, are generally considered to be public figures.
C) Small business owners and politicians, but not entertainers, are generally considered to be public figures.
D) Politicians and entertainers, but not small business owners, are generally considered to be public figures.
E) Small business owners, but not politicians or entertainers, are generally considered to be public figures.

F) A) and B)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

"Hair Stylist Woes." Maryann, a college student, went to see her hair stylist, Candy. Maryann who had black, curly hair, requested straight, blond hair. Candy told her that she could make that change, but that there would be significant upkeep involved. Candy made the change, but Maryann did not do the upkeep required. She also falsely claimed that Candy did not do what Maryann asked her to do, that Candy lied to her, and that Candy was professionally incompetent. Maryann made the statements to friends of hers. She also wrote an editorial in her college newspaper to the effect that Candy's shop should be avoided at all costs because Candy was incompetent. In fact, Candy was a good hair stylist and enjoyed a good reputation up until the time that Maryann started her criticism. Candy threatened to sue Maryann for defamation, but Maryann told Candy that Candy could not prevail because Candy could not prove loss of income. Candy had to admit that while her reputation had been damaged somewhat and she felt embarrassed and humiliated, the damage was primarily among the college population. Her income kept increasing from other segments of the community, and she had suffered no net loss. All her appointment times were booked and she could do no more business. -As far as the statements made to her friends are concerned, which of the following is true in regards to Maryann's statement that Candy cannot recover because Candy has not suffered a loss of income?


A) Maryann is correct.
B) Maryann is correct only if she can show that she did not intend to cause Candy loss of income.
C) Maryann is incorrect because her statements constituted slander per se.
D) Maryann is incorrect because general damages will be presumed.
E) Maryann is incorrect but only because Candy cannot establish liable per se.

F) All of the above
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

If a defamation statement was originally broadcast by a company in the United States and was rebroadcast in the United Kingdom without the consent of the originator of the broadcast, the U.S. company may still be held liable in the United Kingdom court.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

"Hair Stylist Woes." Maryann, a college student, went to see her hair stylist, Candy. Maryann who had black, curly hair, requested straight, blond hair. Candy told her that she could make that change, but that there would be significant upkeep involved. Candy made the change, but Maryann did not do the upkeep required. She also falsely claimed that Candy did not do what Maryann asked her to do, that Candy lied to her, and that Candy was professionally incompetent. Maryann made the statements to friends of hers. She also wrote an editorial in her college newspaper to the effect that Candy's shop should be avoided at all costs because Candy was incompetent. In fact, Candy was a good hair stylist and enjoyed a good reputation up until the time that Maryann started her criticism. Candy threatened to sue Maryann for defamation, but Maryann told Candy that Candy could not prevail because Candy could not prove loss of income. Candy had to admit that while her reputation had been damaged somewhat and she felt embarrassed and humiliated, the damage was primarily among the college population. Her income kept increasing from other segments of the community, and she had suffered no net loss. All her appointment times were booked and she could do no more business. -The defamation printed in the school newspaper would be which of the following?


A) Libel but not slander.
B) Slander but not libel.
C) Libel and slander.
D) No tort was committed because an editorial, not a formal news report, was involved.
E) No tort was committed because the falsehood involved matters of appearance, not business-related matters.

F) A) and C)
G) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Mike gets angry because Ben made a better grade on a test than he did. They get into an argument, and Mike takes a swing at Ben intending to hit him. Ben shoves Mike in order to avoid the blow. Which of the following is true regarding Ben's actions?


A) Ben has committed a battery.
B) Ben has committed both an assault and a battery.
C) Ben has not committed an assault or a battery because he acted in self-defense.
D) Ben cannot rely on self-defense because he was involved in the argument and not completely innocent.
E) Ben cannot rely upon self-defense because his life was not in danger.

F) A) and B)
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following was the result in Thomas P. Lamb v. Tony Rizzo, the case in the text in which the defending newspaper reporter claimed that he could not be held liable to the plaintiff for making alleged defamatory statements because the plaintiff's reputation as a kidnapper and murderer serving three life sentences was so bad that his reputation could not be further harmed?


A) The court allowed the lawsuit to proceed ruling that whether the plaintiff already had a bad reputation was irrelevant in relation to a defamation lawsuit.
B) The court allowed the lawsuit to proceed ruling that whether the plaintiff already had a bad reputation was irrelevant in relation to the lawsuit involved, an action for libel, although the plaintiff's reputation would likely have barred an action for slander.
C) The court allowed the lawsuit to proceed ruling that whether the plaintiff already had a bad reputation was irrelevant in relation to the lawsuit involved, an action for slander, although the plaintiff's reputation would likely have barred an action for libel.
D) The court dismissed the lawsuit recognizing that the facts fit within the jurisdiction's description of when the libel-proof doctrine might apply based upon the plaintiff's already bad reputation.
E) The court dismissed the lawsuit on the basis that the statements were not false but also recognized that the only proof justifying application of the libel-proof doctrine is proof that a defendant has been sentenced to death.

F) None of the above
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is defamation of a business product or service?


A) Disparagement.
B) Interference with a contract.
C) Conversion.
D) Derogation.
E) Abuse of title.

F) A) and C)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following may a person accused of defamation raise as a defense?


A) Truth but not privilege.
B) Privilege but not truth.
C) Need and truth.
D) Need, truth and privilege.
E) Truth and privilege.

F) A) and B)
G) C) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

"Feuding Neighbors." Annette, who is angry because her neighbor, William, allows his dog to chase her cat, decides to get even. She moves a number of farm animals into her backyard and begins playing music at all hours of the night. She also steals a nice lawn chair off of William's deck. She intends to keep the chair and not give it back. Annette further took a rake off of William's deck that she plans to return after she finishes raking her leaves. William did not give her permission to take the rake or the chair. William is not happy about the farm animals and the loud music. -Which of the following would be the most appropriate cause of action, if any, against Annette based upon the farm animals and the music?


A) Trespass to property.
B) Harassment.
C) Private nuisance.
D) Negligence.
E) No cause of action is appropriate because Annette is entitled to use her property as she sees fit.

F) C) and D)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is a tort?


A) A civil or criminal action in state court.
B) A civil or criminal action in state court or federal court.
C) A breach of contract.
D) A wrong or injury to another, other than a breach of contract.
E) A wrong or injury to another, including a breach of contract.

F) D) and E)
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following would constitute false imprisonment?


A) Threatening to use immediate physical force to detain someone; refusing to release property; and physical restraint, such as tying someone to a chair; but not moral pressure.
B) Threatening to use immediate physical force to detain someone; physical restraint, such as tying someone to a chair; and moral pressure; but not refusing to release property.
C) Physical restraint, such as tying someone to a chair, but not threatening to use immediate physical force to detain someone, refusing to release property, or moral pressure.
D) Threatening to use immediate physical force to detain someone; refusing to release property; physical restraint, such as tying someone to a chair; and moral pressure.
E) Physical restraint and threatening to use immediate physical force, but not refusing to release property or moral pressure.

F) A) and B)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The use of moral pressure is insufficient to establish false imprisonment.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is generally true regarding a storekeeper who detains a suspected shoplifter?


A) There is no special rule for shopkeepers. Shopkeepers commit the tort of false imprisonment if they detain anyone even if that person is suspected of shoplifting. Instead, the police should be called.
B) When a retailer has a reason to believe that a person is guilty of shoplifting, the store may question the person about said shoplifting in a reasonable manner and for a reasonable length of time.
C) Whenever a retailer has a reason to believe that a person is guilty of shoplifting, the store may detain the person for any length of time but may not ask any questions prior to the arrival of the police.
D) The shopkeeper may detain the shoplifter only for a reasonable length of time but may not ask any questions prior to the arrival of the police.
E) The shopkeeper may detain a shoplifter but for no longer than 20 minutes because by law it is assumed that it should take no longer than that amount of time for law enforcement officers to arrive.

F) All of the above
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

List and explain the four different types of privacy torts.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The four privacy torts are (1) false lig...

View Answer

Showing 41 - 60 of 66

Related Exams

Show Answer