A) Malicious prosecution, wrongful civil proceedings, and abuse of process.
B) Wrongful civil proceedings but not malicious prosecution or abuse of process.
C) Abuse of process but not malicious prosecution or wrongful civil proceedings.
D) Malicious prosecution and wrongful civil proceedings, but not abuse of process.
E) Malicious prosecution and abuse of process but not wrongful civil proceedings.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The intent at issue is not intent to harm but, rather, is intent to engage in a specific act, which ultimately results in an injury, physical or economic, to another.
B) The intent at issue is not intent to harm but, rather, is intent to engage in a specific act, which ultimately results in a physical injury to another. Economic injury is insufficient.
C) The intent at issue is intent to harm that results in an injury, physical or economic, to another.
D) The intent at issue is intent to harm that results in physical injury to another. Economic injury is insufficient.
E) The intent at issue is not intent to harm and is not intent to engage in a specific act. Instead, negligence will suffice.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the conduct complained of by the plaintiff failed to meet the level of conduct required for a finding of the intentional infliction of emotional distress.
B) That the plaintiff's complaint regarding the disconnection of his telephone service was sufficient to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress but that the plaintiff's other allegations were insufficient to support an award based on the tort of the intentional infliction of emotional distress.
C) That the plaintiff's complaint regarding the refusal to process his application was sufficient to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress but that the plaintiff's other allegations were insufficient to support an award based on the tort of the intentional infliction of emotional distress.
D) That the plaintiff's complaint regarding representatives hanging up on him were sufficient to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress but that the plaintiff's other allegations were insufficient to support an award based on the tort of the intentional infliction of emotional distress.
E) That the plaintiff would be allowed to proceed as to all allegations because they were all adequate to support a verdict based on the intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Criminal
B) Liability
C) Intentional
D) Negligent
E) Strict-liability
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Robby's conduct constitutes a battery.
B) Robby's conduct constitutes an assault.
C) Robby's conduct constitutes both a battery and an assault.
D) Robby's conduct does not constitute an assault because there is no question of immediate bodily harm.
E) Robby's conduct does not constitute an assault because there was no physical contact.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Apprehension and fear are the same thing.
B) A person may be in apprehension of physical harm, even if the same person is too courageous to be afraid of that physical harm.
C) Actual injury is necessary for valid apprehension to be proven.
D) The test for assault involves subjective apprehension, not reasonable apprehension.
E) There is no requirement that the apprehension be of immediate physical contact.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Politicians, but not entertainers, are generally considered to be public figures.
B) Entertainers, but not politicians, are generally considered to be public figures.
C) Small business owners and politicians, but not entertainers, are generally considered to be public figures.
D) Politicians and entertainers, but not small business owners, are generally considered to be public figures.
E) Small business owners, but not politicians or entertainers, are generally considered to be public figures.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Maryann is correct.
B) Maryann is correct only if she can show that she did not intend to cause Candy loss of income.
C) Maryann is incorrect because her statements constituted slander per se.
D) Maryann is incorrect because general damages will be presumed.
E) Maryann is incorrect but only because Candy cannot establish liable per se.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Libel but not slander.
B) Slander but not libel.
C) Libel and slander.
D) No tort was committed because an editorial, not a formal news report, was involved.
E) No tort was committed because the falsehood involved matters of appearance, not business-related matters.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Ben has committed a battery.
B) Ben has committed both an assault and a battery.
C) Ben has not committed an assault or a battery because he acted in self-defense.
D) Ben cannot rely on self-defense because he was involved in the argument and not completely innocent.
E) Ben cannot rely upon self-defense because his life was not in danger.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court allowed the lawsuit to proceed ruling that whether the plaintiff already had a bad reputation was irrelevant in relation to a defamation lawsuit.
B) The court allowed the lawsuit to proceed ruling that whether the plaintiff already had a bad reputation was irrelevant in relation to the lawsuit involved, an action for libel, although the plaintiff's reputation would likely have barred an action for slander.
C) The court allowed the lawsuit to proceed ruling that whether the plaintiff already had a bad reputation was irrelevant in relation to the lawsuit involved, an action for slander, although the plaintiff's reputation would likely have barred an action for libel.
D) The court dismissed the lawsuit recognizing that the facts fit within the jurisdiction's description of when the libel-proof doctrine might apply based upon the plaintiff's already bad reputation.
E) The court dismissed the lawsuit on the basis that the statements were not false but also recognized that the only proof justifying application of the libel-proof doctrine is proof that a defendant has been sentenced to death.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Disparagement.
B) Interference with a contract.
C) Conversion.
D) Derogation.
E) Abuse of title.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Truth but not privilege.
B) Privilege but not truth.
C) Need and truth.
D) Need, truth and privilege.
E) Truth and privilege.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Trespass to property.
B) Harassment.
C) Private nuisance.
D) Negligence.
E) No cause of action is appropriate because Annette is entitled to use her property as she sees fit.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A civil or criminal action in state court.
B) A civil or criminal action in state court or federal court.
C) A breach of contract.
D) A wrong or injury to another, other than a breach of contract.
E) A wrong or injury to another, including a breach of contract.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Threatening to use immediate physical force to detain someone; refusing to release property; and physical restraint, such as tying someone to a chair; but not moral pressure.
B) Threatening to use immediate physical force to detain someone; physical restraint, such as tying someone to a chair; and moral pressure; but not refusing to release property.
C) Physical restraint, such as tying someone to a chair, but not threatening to use immediate physical force to detain someone, refusing to release property, or moral pressure.
D) Threatening to use immediate physical force to detain someone; refusing to release property; physical restraint, such as tying someone to a chair; and moral pressure.
E) Physical restraint and threatening to use immediate physical force, but not refusing to release property or moral pressure.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) There is no special rule for shopkeepers. Shopkeepers commit the tort of false imprisonment if they detain anyone even if that person is suspected of shoplifting. Instead, the police should be called.
B) When a retailer has a reason to believe that a person is guilty of shoplifting, the store may question the person about said shoplifting in a reasonable manner and for a reasonable length of time.
C) Whenever a retailer has a reason to believe that a person is guilty of shoplifting, the store may detain the person for any length of time but may not ask any questions prior to the arrival of the police.
D) The shopkeeper may detain the shoplifter only for a reasonable length of time but may not ask any questions prior to the arrival of the police.
E) The shopkeeper may detain a shoplifter but for no longer than 20 minutes because by law it is assumed that it should take no longer than that amount of time for law enforcement officers to arrive.
Correct Answer
verified
Short Answer
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Showing 41 - 60 of 66
Related Exams